PsycEXTRA Dataset 2008
DOI: 10.1037/e719362011-019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The curse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, there are two modules in E-iSpec: one for determining atmospheric parameters (using the equivalent width (EW) method, see Section 3.1) and the other for determining abundances (using EW and synthetic spectral fitting (SSF), see Section 3.2). For the spectral analyses, the latest LTE model atmospheres, ATLAS9 (Castelli & Kurucz 2003) or MARCS (Gustafsson et al 2008), chosen depending on the of the star, were used in combination with the LTE abundance calculation routine MOOG (version July 2009) by Sneden (1973). The model atmospheres were uniquely determined by the , , [Fe/H] and .…”
Section: Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In brief, there are two modules in E-iSpec: one for determining atmospheric parameters (using the equivalent width (EW) method, see Section 3.1) and the other for determining abundances (using EW and synthetic spectral fitting (SSF), see Section 3.2). For the spectral analyses, the latest LTE model atmospheres, ATLAS9 (Castelli & Kurucz 2003) or MARCS (Gustafsson et al 2008), chosen depending on the of the star, were used in combination with the LTE abundance calculation routine MOOG (version July 2009) by Sneden (1973). The model atmospheres were uniquely determined by the , , [Fe/H] and .…”
Section: Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We derived chemical abundances using both the EW method and the SSF technique – which are modules of E-iSpec. In the EW method, observed EWs were compared with predictions from theoretical model atmospheres (ATLAS9 Castelli & Kurucz 2003 or MARCS Gustafsson et al 2008), involving an iterative adjustment of assumed abundances until observed and predicted EWs converged, yielding best-fit abundance values. The SSF technique involved comparing observed stellar spectra with synthetic spectra generated by theoretical model atmospheres, employing chi-square fitting to iteratively refine model parameters and derive precise chemical abundances.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%