The Current State of Resident Training in Genomic Pathology

Abstract

Objectives To determine the current state of pathology resident training in genomic and molecular pathology. Methods The Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group developed survey and knowledge questions for the 2013 Pathology Resident In-Service Examination (RISE). Sixteen demographic questions related to amount of training, current and predicted future use, and perceived ability in molecular pathology vs. genomic medicine were included along with five genomic pathology and 19 molecular pathology knowledge questions. Results A total of 2,506 pathology residents took the 2013 RISE with approximately 600 individuals per post-graduate year (PGY). For genomic medicine, 42% of PGY-4 respondents stated they had no training compared to 7% for molecular pathology (p<0.001). PGY-4 resident perceived ability in genomic medicine, comfort in discussing results, and predicted future use as a practicing pathologist were less than reported for molecular pathology (p<0.001). There was a greater increase by PGY in knowledge question scores for molecular than for genomic pathology. Conclusions The RISE is a powerful tool in assessing the state of resident training in genomic pathology and current results suggest a significant deficit. The results also provide a baseline to assess future initiatives to improve genomics education for pathology residents such as those developed by the TRIG Working Group.

Experience with targeted next generation sequencing for the care of lung cancer: Insights into promises and limitations of genomic oncology in day-to-day practice

“…understanding what methods are specifically utilized by commercial/institutional genomic assay vendors); optimal/adequate specimen selection; utilization of validated resources for interpretation of results; understanding the therapeutic implications—or lack thereof—of a given finding; obtaining informed consent for testing from patients; and discussing results of testing with patients—including findings of uncertain significance. In recognition of this evolving and increasingly apparent educational need, colleagues have already started to take systematic approaches to educate trainees in this important domain (23-25). …”

Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer

“…Exemplary efforts to promote genomic pathology education have been made (eg, Health Education England’s Medical Genomics Programme (UK) 122 ; Training Residents in Genomics Working Group (USA)). 123 A network approach in conjunction with national/international pathological societies is warranted to advance learning for the present and future workforce. Funded programmes should be established to encourage collaboration of histopathologists with molecular geneticists, bioinformaticians and physical scientists to establish optimal methodologies of data accumulation/integration, thus retooling and empowering the emerging molecular pathology generation.…”

The Anatomy to Genomics (ATG) Start Genetics medical school initiative: incorporating exome sequencing data from cadavers used for Anatomy instruction into the first year curriculum

“…Several previous efforts to increase genetics and genomics education in the undergraduate and graduate medical curricula have been reported [ 5 , 10 , 32 ]. Genetics and genomics “tracks” have also been developed for medical students [ 33 , 34 ].…”