2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The current state of gender-specific delinquency programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the results of the current study about the main causes behind female juvenile delinquency Foley (2008) confirmed that, surveys and focus groups with justice-involved girls and their staff and administrators, family problems were the top risk factor for girls' delinquency, followed by individual problems, peer issues, and school and community factors, respectively. Furthermore, Church II et al (2012) indicated that, the critical role the family plays in juvenile delinquency has been said to be the single most replicated finding in the juvenile deviance literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with the results of the current study about the main causes behind female juvenile delinquency Foley (2008) confirmed that, surveys and focus groups with justice-involved girls and their staff and administrators, family problems were the top risk factor for girls' delinquency, followed by individual problems, peer issues, and school and community factors, respectively. Furthermore, Church II et al (2012) indicated that, the critical role the family plays in juvenile delinquency has been said to be the single most replicated finding in the juvenile deviance literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A growing body of evidence has suggested that prevention programs can have differential impact by gender (Blake, Amaro, Schwartz, & Flinchbaugh, 2001; Fagan & Lindsey, 2014; Foley, 2008). Prior analyses have found that CTC produced greater reductions in use of alcohol and smokeless tobacco among boys than girls by Grade 8 (Oesterle, Hawkins, Fagan, Abbott, & Catalano, 2010) and a marginally greater reduction in delinquency for boys than for girls in Grade 10 (Oesterle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Subgroup Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foley (2008) further argued that current gender-specific programming has not proven efficacious for girls in the justice system. Lipsey, Wilson, and Cothern (2000) found mental healthadministered institutional programs to be more effective than juvenile justice-administered programming.…”
Section: Current Institutional Responses To Girls and Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%