2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The current state and future directions of marine turtle toxicology research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effects of high cadmium levels on turtle physiological processes and their implications on turtle survival and reproduction remain unknown. Recently, Finlayson et al (2016) stressed the need for further research on marine turtle ecotoxicology, particularly using non-invasive in vitro methods. In addition, considering the transoceanic range of loggerhead turtles, ecotoxicology studies should be accompanied by the assessment of diet variation and health markers across life cycle stages, from pelagic juveniles to neritic adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects of high cadmium levels on turtle physiological processes and their implications on turtle survival and reproduction remain unknown. Recently, Finlayson et al (2016) stressed the need for further research on marine turtle ecotoxicology, particularly using non-invasive in vitro methods. In addition, considering the transoceanic range of loggerhead turtles, ecotoxicology studies should be accompanied by the assessment of diet variation and health markers across life cycle stages, from pelagic juveniles to neritic adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As adults, the turtles leave the foraging ground periodically for mating and egg-laying at their mating/nesting location before returning back to their foraging ground (Lutz and Musick, 1997). These coastal foraging habitats are critical for the recovery and support of green turtle populations, yet many of these areas have been heavily impacted by urbanization thus presenting health risks with anthropogenic stressors such as pollution from trace metals (Gardner and Oberdorster, 2005;Finlayson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the effects of pollutants on marine turtles has been elevated to a global research priority (Hamann et al, 2010;Rees et al, 2016). A recent publication reviewed toxicity studies in marine turtles and found 49 toxicology studies relating to marine turtles, and of those, 33 identified toxic effects of various contaminants (e.g., inorganic and organic; Finlayson et al, 2016). Furthermore, just four of these studies examined correlations with toxic elements and health parameters (loggerheads: Day et al, 2007;Camacho et al, 2013; green turtles, Chelonia mydas: Komoroske et al, 2011;Kemps' ridley, Lepidochelys kempii: Innis et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, just four of these studies examined correlations with toxic elements and health parameters (loggerheads: Day et al, 2007;Camacho et al, 2013; green turtles, Chelonia mydas: Komoroske et al, 2011;Kemps' ridley, Lepidochelys kempii: Innis et al, 2008). Since the publication of Finlayson et al (2016), three additional studies examined correlations between hematological and plasma biochemistry analytes and toxic elements in marine turtles (green turtles: Villa et al, 2016;Perrault et al, 2017;loggerheads: Ley-Quiñónez et al, 2017;Kemp's ridleys: Perrault et al, 2017). These seven studies documented correlations between toxic elements and indicators of disease (e.g., fibropapillomatosis), body condition, organ function, immune function, ion regulation, oxidative stress, and overall health; however, these results are often not discussed due to confounding factors (e.g., size, season, sex) or due to lack of understanding of reptilian toxicology ( Innis et al, 2008;Komoroske et al, 2011;Labrada-Martagόn et al, 2011;Camacho et al, 2013;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation