2018
DOI: 10.4000/dynenviron.2425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The current state and ecological restoration of peatlands in Estonia

Abstract: Peatlands are globally important ecosystems for their habitats, carbon sink and freshwater reservoir functions. Estonia is among the most peatland-rich countries worldwide with ca 20% (9,150 km 2 ) of its land area covered with peat soils. Majority of these peatlands, however, are altered by the drainage for the agriculture, forestry and peat extraction that has led to a degradation of peatland ecosystems, and declined their functioning. The rapid loss of peatland habitats, subsidence of peat soils and carbon … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies investigating soil CO 2 efflux from drained peatlands have been conducted in Fennoscandia and in the Baltic countries. This may be due to the fact that peatlands cover 31–34% of Sweden and Finland, around 20% of Estonia, around 10% of Latvia and Lithuania, and about 7.7% of Norway’s territory [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Several studies in which total soil CO 2 efflux measurements were performed using a closed chamber system were selected for comparison ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies investigating soil CO 2 efflux from drained peatlands have been conducted in Fennoscandia and in the Baltic countries. This may be due to the fact that peatlands cover 31–34% of Sweden and Finland, around 20% of Estonia, around 10% of Latvia and Lithuania, and about 7.7% of Norway’s territory [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Several studies in which total soil CO 2 efflux measurements were performed using a closed chamber system were selected for comparison ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%