2019
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Current and Future Potential of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Electroencephalography in Psychiatry

Abstract: The search for biological targets in psychiatric disorders is essential to better understand illness mechanisms and also to monitor and predict response to currently available therapeutic interventions. To this end, the combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography (TMS‐EEG) has emerged as a powerful clinical research tool. TMS‐EEG allows cortical properties, such as excitability, inhibition, oscillatory activity, and connectivity, to be directly probed within a specific region o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been possible to evaluate changes in the functional connections between the parietal cortex and medial frontal areas within the default mode network. Moreover, a recent review (Hui and others 2019) reports evidence of the involvement of alterations in gamma oscillations in the prefrontal areas for depression and the potential of TMS-EEG to identify this as a reliable biomarker. Other studies (Colombo and others 2019) have focused on the possibility of deriving an index from TMS-EEG, which may be helpful for supporting the diagnosis and valuation of clinical conditions (i.e., consciousness disorders).…”
Section: Features Of Tms-eeg Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been possible to evaluate changes in the functional connections between the parietal cortex and medial frontal areas within the default mode network. Moreover, a recent review (Hui and others 2019) reports evidence of the involvement of alterations in gamma oscillations in the prefrontal areas for depression and the potential of TMS-EEG to identify this as a reliable biomarker. Other studies (Colombo and others 2019) have focused on the possibility of deriving an index from TMS-EEG, which may be helpful for supporting the diagnosis and valuation of clinical conditions (i.e., consciousness disorders).…”
Section: Features Of Tms-eeg Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early applications of this technology were restricted to measuring or mapping motor cortex activity, the development of compatible electroencephalography (EEG) techniques has led to the growth of combined TMS/EEG to measure and manipulate motor and non-motor cortical function (Daskalakis et al, 2012;Tremblay et al, 2019). In contrast to other non-invasive modalities such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the superior temporal resolution of TMS/EEG offers a unique window into deficits in cellular function and synaptic transmission across cortical networks (Premoli et al, 2014;Kaskie and Ferrarelli, 2018;Hui et al, 2019). In this review, we will introduce the lay reader to general concepts pertaining to TMS/EEG and review recent studies that have employed TMS-EEG to directly measure cortical dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 185 , 186 More recently, it has been advocated that prefrontal excitability indexed using TMS-evoked potentials and TMS-EEG systems might be more a specific marker of NIN effects compared to MCE, as these methods can probe the cortical excitability of frontal brain areas implicated in depressive pathophysiology, with high temporal resolution. 187 However, these techniques are still novel and technically challenging, and it is still unclear which indexes better represent GABA activity. 116 These limitations notwithstanding, promising findings have been observed using this biomarker modality to predict NIN response.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities For Precision Non-implantable Nmentioning
confidence: 99%