2019
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cumulative venous thromboembolism incidence and risk factors in intensive care patients receiving the guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis

Abstract: Few prospective studies have reported the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially for patients receiving guideline-recommended VTE prophylaxis. We aimed to design a prospective observational study to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors of ICU-acquired VTE for those populations. We prospectively studied 281 consecutively included patients in the ICU at a single center. All patients provided informed consent. Patients received… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute inflammation, as measured by elevations in these markers, has previously been associated with increased thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients without COVID-19 19,20 ; indeed, we found significant correlations between D-dimer levels and each measured inflammatory marker (Figure 1). Given previously reported 14-day cumulative VTE rates of 7% to 8% in critically ill patients without COVID-19 receiving standard heparinbased thromboprophylaxis, 21 our observed rate of 7.6% in critically ill patients receiving similar prophylactic treatment over a median follow-up of 10 days was comparable. Likewise, to contextualize our major bleeding rate of 5.6% in the critically ill, a large prospective study of bleeding events in 3746 critically ill patients without COVID-19 identified major bleeding (defined similarly as in our study) in 208 patients (5.6%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Acute inflammation, as measured by elevations in these markers, has previously been associated with increased thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients without COVID-19 19,20 ; indeed, we found significant correlations between D-dimer levels and each measured inflammatory marker (Figure 1). Given previously reported 14-day cumulative VTE rates of 7% to 8% in critically ill patients without COVID-19 receiving standard heparinbased thromboprophylaxis, 21 our observed rate of 7.6% in critically ill patients receiving similar prophylactic treatment over a median follow-up of 10 days was comparable. Likewise, to contextualize our major bleeding rate of 5.6% in the critically ill, a large prospective study of bleeding events in 3746 critically ill patients without COVID-19 identified major bleeding (defined similarly as in our study) in 208 patients (5.6%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This incidence of thromboembolic events is considerably lower than the 15% to 42% incidence reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Europe [10][11][12][13][14] and is more consistent with the incidence reported in critically ill pa-tients without COVID-19. 15 Understanding the reason for these differences will be important as hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is pursued as a potential therapeutic target. 16 This study identified considerable interhospital variation in the administration of medications and supportive therapies intended to treat COVID-19 and associated organ injury.…”
Section: Other Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analyses have estimated a significant lower incidence of acute PE in the ICU population, which generally increase in mechanically ventilated patients [34,35]. The high incidence of acute PE in critically ill patients may reflect a more severe pro-coagulant state [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%