2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS): A Contribution to the Italian Validation

Abstract: In the current globalized working context, professionals are asked to be able to implement specific competences. Cultural Intelligence is a construct referring to an individual’s ability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings and is conceived as an aggregate multidimensional construct. Purpose of this study was to examine the validity of score interpretations of the Italian version of the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS). CQS is aimed to measure individual ability to understand, act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"I check the accuracy of my cultural knowledge as I interact with people from different cultures", α = .81); cognitive CQ (six items, e.g., "I know the rules for expressing non-verbal behaviour in other cultures", α = .83); motivational CQ (five items, e.g., "I enjoy interacting with people from different cultures", α = .89); behavioural CQ (five items, e.g., "I change my verbal behaviour when a cross-cultural interaction requires it", α = .84). This robust and reliable scale has been utilized by previous studies (e.g., Gozzoli and Gazzaroli 2018), confirming the existence of four specific CQ dimensions. Participants indicated how much they agreed with each statement concerning their cultural abilities on a seven-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree), where higher scores indicated higher CQ levels.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…"I check the accuracy of my cultural knowledge as I interact with people from different cultures", α = .81); cognitive CQ (six items, e.g., "I know the rules for expressing non-verbal behaviour in other cultures", α = .83); motivational CQ (five items, e.g., "I enjoy interacting with people from different cultures", α = .89); behavioural CQ (five items, e.g., "I change my verbal behaviour when a cross-cultural interaction requires it", α = .84). This robust and reliable scale has been utilized by previous studies (e.g., Gozzoli and Gazzaroli 2018), confirming the existence of four specific CQ dimensions. Participants indicated how much they agreed with each statement concerning their cultural abilities on a seven-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree), where higher scores indicated higher CQ levels.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Even though much operators can speak different languages, it can happen that they know too little of each other’s language and that they struggle and simplify certain concepts by translating them with simple words. This ability can be compared to the construct of the cultural intelligence, defined as an individual’s capability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings (Gozzoli and Gazzaroli, 2018). These elements can be a source of great difficulty, especially in the process of establishing a good relationship between the operators and ASs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of cultural intelligence (CQ), suggested by Earley and Ang (2003), can be an indicator of the extent to which teachers are culturally sensitive and capable of functioning and managing in culturally diverse settings (Brislin, Worthley, & MacNab, 2006;Earley & Ang, 2003;Gozzoli & Gazzaroli, 2018;Triandis, 2006;Van Dyne, Ang, & Koh, 2008). Van Dyne and colleagues (2012) identified four dimensions of cultural intelligence and developed its measurement: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%