2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cultural hierarchy in funding: Government funding of the performing arts based on ethnic and geographic distinctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are definitely witnessing a participative turn in cultural policy (Bonet and Négrier, 2018), with public policy documents everywhere in the Global North stating, like the strategic program of the Finnish government, that ‘(c)ultural services will become more accessible, and the conditions will improve to allow culture to flourish’ (Government programme, 2019: 184). Whether public funding is considered to reproduce the existing hierarchies of society (Bjørnsen, 2012; Feder and Katz-Gerro, 2015) or to modify the social hierarchies by funding culture consumed by underprivileged groups (Belfiore, 2002), it remains unclear what kinds of returns cultural participation really generates and whether non-participation should be considered a problem in the first place (Stevenson, 2013) – or whether lamenting non-participation just further legitimizes existing social hierarchies. While Bourdieu often emphasized that disadvantaged groups should be given the ‘keys’ to assess culture through education, offering them ‘an implicit recognition of the right not to understand and to demand to understand’ (Bourdieu and Darbel, 1991: 94), it seems like in the case of some of the interviewees in this study, several overlapping and structural factors are an effective barrier to any influence that cultural consumption, or even carefully targeted cultural policies, could possibly have.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are definitely witnessing a participative turn in cultural policy (Bonet and Négrier, 2018), with public policy documents everywhere in the Global North stating, like the strategic program of the Finnish government, that ‘(c)ultural services will become more accessible, and the conditions will improve to allow culture to flourish’ (Government programme, 2019: 184). Whether public funding is considered to reproduce the existing hierarchies of society (Bjørnsen, 2012; Feder and Katz-Gerro, 2015) or to modify the social hierarchies by funding culture consumed by underprivileged groups (Belfiore, 2002), it remains unclear what kinds of returns cultural participation really generates and whether non-participation should be considered a problem in the first place (Stevenson, 2013) – or whether lamenting non-participation just further legitimizes existing social hierarchies. While Bourdieu often emphasized that disadvantaged groups should be given the ‘keys’ to assess culture through education, offering them ‘an implicit recognition of the right not to understand and to demand to understand’ (Bourdieu and Darbel, 1991: 94), it seems like in the case of some of the interviewees in this study, several overlapping and structural factors are an effective barrier to any influence that cultural consumption, or even carefully targeted cultural policies, could possibly have.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discourse built the macro-perspective of social superstructures, which to this day maintains centre–periphery hierarchies in Israel that are reinforced by cultural-artistic distinctions between ‘high’ and ‘low’. However, some scholars have shown that also in Israel, peripheries might be a source for artistic flourishing and innovation (Saada-Ophir 2006) and that the borders between the two might be blurring with time (Feder and Katz-Gerro 2015). The following section follows the lead of these scholars and proposes to observe these power relations from a micro-perspective, emphasising the trajectory as a means of movement within the social structure (Bourdieu, 1992) and, at the same time, of negating and eroding this structure (de Certeau, 1984).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Who Enables What and For Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e speech was given at the IV Congress of said union in 2001. Looking back, A. Kolyagin noted: "I quickly realized that we, the whole of our theatrical community, could not survive without the state with which we had to come to an agreement" 12 . Let us emphasize that this attitude was quite in line with the growing role of the state in culture in the beginning in the early 2000s (Jakobson, Rudnik & Toepler, 2016).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e principles and methods of such support are analyzed (Feder & Katz-Gerro, 2012;Abankina, 2015;Bukviс, Mihaljeviс & Tokiс, 2016;Hetherington, 2017). Political factors of the regional distribution of performing arts organizations' public funding are investigated (Bertelli, Connolly, Mason & Conover, 2014;Feder & Katz-Gerro, 2015). Th e infl uence of public funding limitations on theatres' repertoire formation are analyzed (Neligan, 2006;Werck, Stultjes & Heyndels, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation