2018
DOI: 10.5964/jnc.v4i2.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cultural challenge in mathematical cognition

Abstract: In their recent paper on “Challenges in mathematical cognition”, Alcock and colleagues (Alcock et al. [2016]. Challenges in mathematical cognition: A collaboratively-derived research agenda. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 20-41) defined a research agenda through 26 specific research questions. An important dimension of mathematical cognition almost completely absent from their discussion is the cultural constitution of mathematical cognition. Spanning work from a broad range of disciplines – including anth… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the type of task, as well as on the conditions in which a given task is performed, different neural mechanisms might be invoked for disparate kinds of mental calculations (Curtis et al, 2016;Yusoff et al, 2016;Beller et al, 2018;Hickendorff et al, 2019). For example, complex addition or subtraction is based on mechanisms that are distinct from the ones for complex multiplication or division.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of task, as well as on the conditions in which a given task is performed, different neural mechanisms might be invoked for disparate kinds of mental calculations (Curtis et al, 2016;Yusoff et al, 2016;Beller et al, 2018;Hickendorff et al, 2019). For example, complex addition or subtraction is based on mechanisms that are distinct from the ones for complex multiplication or division.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cultural objects go, numbers occupy a niche of their own; some can be surreptitious and veiled under a cloak of superstition, for example, the association of number 13 with bad luck in American culture, the link between number 4 and death in Chinese culture [2], the avoidance of counting people by numbers in Jewish orthodoxy on account of its bad omen [1]. Ongoing research of number words across languages paints a landscape of contrasts ( [3][4][5] inter alia). On the one hand, we observe extreme variation in the different types of systems that various cultures use (or not!)…”
Section: Why Numbers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most Indo-European languages, building higher numbers and extending number words to denote larger quantities involves following (existing) language-internal rules. Thus, excluding the lower numbers (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), which are encoded by unanalysable atoms, and the running numbers (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), given their considerable variation, for the remaining higher numbers, stable morphological patterns can be detected where the base (10s, 20s, 30s, 40s) is combined with the atom (3 in 23, 5 in 55) in a head-dependent manner, in accordance with patterns involving nominal and clausal word orders [2]. That is, morphological word-formation process ties in with syntactic constraints.…”
Section: Number Words-not a Privileged Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number words are possibly one of the most paramount cultural tools for expressing numerosities. Different aspects of numerical cognition are indeed saturated with culture (Beller et al, 2018;Núñez, 2009;Núñez, 2017), with proprieties of numeration systems that vary across languages (Bender & Beller, 2012). One of these proprieties is certainly the extent of the system itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%