Pectolite is sometimes classed as a pyroxene, sometimes as a zeolite. Nearly rectangular cleavages and a metasilicate composition support the former classification, while the latter rests on the hydrous character of the mineral and its typical occurence as a secondary product in trap rocks. The isomorphism of pectolite and wollastonite has long been recognized, and both minerals are described in the handbooks as monoclinic, elongated with the symmetry axis and oriented with the cleavages parallel to the base and the orthopinacoid.The described forms of pectolite 1 ) are the base, the orthopinacoid, several orthodomes with normal symbols, and three prisms with the unusual symbols, (140), (340), (540). Two clinodomes and a single pyramid are also given, but an examination of the original descriptions show that these forms are insufficiently supported by observation. In none of the original descriptions of pectolite is there a positive statement of observed monoclinic symmetry. On the contrary, Greg and Lettsom (1858) commented on the hemihedral arrangement of the prisms; later, Goodchild (1903) reached the conclusion that pectolite is not monoclinic but triclinic, with elements which could not be completely determined with the material available. Pectolite is thus known with certainty to have forms in two zones whose axes are apparently at right angles; the existence and relations of forms in other zones are uncertain and the generally accepted monoclinic symmetry is speculative.In a recently completed study of the morphology of wollastonite 2 ) a crystallographic discussion of form-rich crystals from Crestmore, California, led unequivocally to triclinic elements closely comparable to those proposed for wollastonite by Warren and Biscoe (1931) on the basis of X-ray analysis. Since these authors also showed that pectolite from Norway is likewise triclinic, with elements similar to those of wollastonite, it was to be expected that the morphological data on pectolite would be found to agree with the röntgenographic results. This indeed proved to be the case. The base and the front pinacoid and all the remaining forms 1) Goldschmidt, Atlas der Kristallformen. Heidelberg 1923, p. 45. 2) Offered for publication elsewhere. Zeltschr. f. Kristallographie. 90. Bd. 7 Brought to you by |