2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00131-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of the conserved GTPase of SRP54 from the archaeon Acidianus ambivalens and its comparison with related structures suggests a model for the SRP–SRP receptor complex

Abstract: The overall structure of SRP-GTPases is well conserved between bacteria and archaea, which indicates strong similarities in the regulation of the SRP-targeting pathway. Surprisingly, structure comparisons identified a homodimeric ATP-binding protein as the closest relative. A heterodimer model for the SRP-SR interaction is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some SIMIBI class G proteins dimerization is not sufficient for stimulation of hydrolysis (42) and the interaction with another protein is required, e.g., MinD requires MinE (48) and Soj needs Spoj (49) and NifH in the nitrogenase complex needs the interaction with the MoFe protein (50). Previously NifH was identified as the closest structural homolog of SRP GTPases (34). For FlhF this homology might extend to the regulation by an external partner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some SIMIBI class G proteins dimerization is not sufficient for stimulation of hydrolysis (42) and the interaction with another protein is required, e.g., MinD requires MinE (48) and Soj needs Spoj (49) and NifH in the nitrogenase complex needs the interaction with the MoFe protein (50). Previously NifH was identified as the closest structural homolog of SRP GTPases (34). For FlhF this homology might extend to the regulation by an external partner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimal set of SRP components is found in bacteria, which consist of shorter RNAs (4.5S RNA) and only Ffh, the protein homologous to SRP54 (6,7). SRP54, the only protein component present in all SRPs, comprises an N-terminal domain (N, a four-helix bundle), a central GTPase domain [G, a ras-like GTPase fold, with an additional unique ␣-␤-␣ insertion box domain (IBD)], and a methionine-rich C-terminal domain (M, an all-␣ structure) (8,9). The N and G domains are structurally and functionally coupled; together, they build the NG domain that is connected to the M domain through a flexible linker (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRP54 interacts with the ribosomal proteins L23a and L35 (24) (29), and the mutation of a universally conserved glycine (Gly-254 in Sulfolobus solfataricus) in the G domain, giving rise to a lethal phenotype and reduced interaction with the SR (30). Both sites are located in the interface between the N and G domains, which has been proposed to be involved in a common intramolecular signaling mechanism (29,(31)(32)(33).A number of structures of the NG domain of Ffh from eubacteria and SRP54 from archaea (22,31,32,34) and the NG domain of FtsY from E. coli (21) have been reported. The structure of a major part of the M domain with and without RNA has also been determined for E. coli Ffh, human SRP54, and Ffh from Thermus aquaticus (35)(36)(37)(38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRP54 interacts with the ribosomal proteins L23a and L35 (24) (29), and the mutation of a universally conserved glycine (Gly-254 in Sulfolobus solfataricus) in the G domain, giving rise to a lethal phenotype and reduced interaction with the SR (30). Both sites are located in the interface between the N and G domains, which has been proposed to be involved in a common intramolecular signaling mechanism (29,(31)(32)(33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation