2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0885715618000118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of MoO2(O2)H2O

Abstract: The crystal structure of MoO2(O2)H2O has been solved by analogy with the WO2(O2)H2O structure and refined with synchrotron powder diffraction data obtained from beamline 08B1-1 at the Canadian Light Source. Rietveld refinement, performed with the software package GSAS, yielded monoclinic lattice parameters of a = 12.0417(4) Å, b = 3.87003(14) Å, c = 7.38390(24) Å, and β = 78.0843(11)° (Z = 4, space group P21/n). The structure is composed of double zigzag molybdate chains running parallel to the b-axis. The Rie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the previously characterized MoO 2 (O 2 )H 2 O structure (Reid et al, 2018), this structure is characterized by double zigzag molybdate chains running parallel to the b-axis. The additional water molecule between molybdate chains in the current compound results in a less densely packed structure compared with MoO 2 (O 2 )H 2 O (the calculated densities are 2.988 and 3.511 g cm −3 , respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the previously characterized MoO 2 (O 2 )H 2 O structure (Reid et al, 2018), this structure is characterized by double zigzag molybdate chains running parallel to the b-axis. The additional water molecule between molybdate chains in the current compound results in a less densely packed structure compared with MoO 2 (O 2 )H 2 O (the calculated densities are 2.988 and 3.511 g cm −3 , respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The RMS Cartesian displacement between the Rietveld refined atomic coordinates and the two DFT models are 0.2437 and 0.2446 Å, respectively (for DFT-O2 and DFT-O4). The RMS differences are higher than those obtained for previous molybdate structures refined using comparable data acquisition (Reid et al, 2017(Reid et al, , 2018. This probably reflects increased uncertainty in the correct Bragg intensities for the main phase because of the use of Le Bail refinement for the unknown impurity phase observed in the current data.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation