2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-013-4744-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crustal structures of the central Longmenshan along and its margins as related to the seismotectonics of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the Moho depth is coupled with the topography in two ways: (1) higher topography corresponds to deeper Moho; lower topography, shallower Moho; and (2) higher relief corresponds to more steeply dipping Moho, whereas low‐relief surface is underlain by more shallowly dipping Moho. This observation agrees with many previous studies that are based upon Pn wave (Xu & Song, ), P wave or S wave velocity (H. Y. Li et al, ; Lei & Zhao, ; Q. Y. Liu, van der Hilst, et al, ; C. Y. Wang et al, ), passive source seismic profiling (Z. J. Zhang et al, ), wide‐angle/deep seismic reflection profiles (Guo et al, ; S. X. Jia et al, ), and receiver functions (Hu et al, , ; Shen et al, , ), as well as those crustal models that are developed using joint inversion (Laske et al, ; Lou et al, ; X. Wang, Li, et al, ) and deep seismic sounding profiles (W. Wang, Wu, et al, ).…”
Section: Integration Of the Moho Structure With Topographysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the Moho depth is coupled with the topography in two ways: (1) higher topography corresponds to deeper Moho; lower topography, shallower Moho; and (2) higher relief corresponds to more steeply dipping Moho, whereas low‐relief surface is underlain by more shallowly dipping Moho. This observation agrees with many previous studies that are based upon Pn wave (Xu & Song, ), P wave or S wave velocity (H. Y. Li et al, ; Lei & Zhao, ; Q. Y. Liu, van der Hilst, et al, ; C. Y. Wang et al, ), passive source seismic profiling (Z. J. Zhang et al, ), wide‐angle/deep seismic reflection profiles (Guo et al, ; S. X. Jia et al, ), and receiver functions (Hu et al, , ; Shen et al, , ), as well as those crustal models that are developed using joint inversion (Laske et al, ; Lou et al, ; X. Wang, Li, et al, ) and deep seismic sounding profiles (W. Wang, Wu, et al, ).…”
Section: Integration Of the Moho Structure With Topographysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One high‐velocity body is located largely beneath the SCB, which has been reported in previous studies (S. X. Jia et al, ; Q. Y. Liu, van der Hilst, et al, ; Z. Xu et al, ). This high‐velocity block characterizes the Archean basement and the nucleus of the Yangtze craton (J. P. Zheng et al, ).…”
Section: Three‐dimensional Image Of Structures In Mantle Lithospheresupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The profile is about 500 km in length which crosses the Sichuan basin for ~150 km, Longmen Shan for ~70 km, and the Eastern Tibet for ~280 km. The wide‐angle survey reveals that the crustal thickness beneath Sichuan basin is about 42 km [ Jia et al , ], whereas our independent deep seismic sounding survey gives the converted depth to Moho reflectors is also 40–42 km. The converted deep seismic sounding profile shows the bending of Moho reflectors to more than 52 km beneath the Longmen Shan from ~40 km beneath the Sichuan basin that coincides with the results of wide‐angle refraction survey (Figure b).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since the observed average Moho depth under the LMS is $50 km, given an average upper crust thickness of 15 km Jia et al, 2014), the average lower crust thickness is $35 km. According to the anisotropic model (Sun et al, 2012), we obtain an average splitting time of 0.58 s in the lower crust, which is close to the measurements with the average splitting time of 0.57 s in this study.…”
Section: Primary Cause Of Crustal Anisotropy (Moho Ps Splitting)mentioning
confidence: 99%