1984
DOI: 10.1127/njgpa/168/1984/230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crustal Structure in Southern Iran Derived from Seismic Explosion Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He presumed that all metamorphic units and volcanic‐bearing post‐Triassic strata, including the Hamadan phyllites, are “allochthonous.” The stratigraphic and intrusive superposition of the extensive calc‐alkaline Jurassic volcanics and intrusives of the SSA with pre‐Jurassic rocks, including intrusive relationships of arc batholiths into the pre‐Jurassic substrate (e.g., Figure ), and stratigraphic and structural continuity across the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary reported in many previous studies [e.g., Zahedi , ; Berberian and Berberian , ; Kazmin et al ., ] are not accounted for in the model. Alavi [] also suggested that the thick crust and relatively high mean elevation of the SSA were caused by south directed imbrication of up to 15 km of nappes composed of fragments of the Cretaceous and younger arc (Figure a), as opposed to underthrusting of the leading edge of the Arabian plate advocated by most workers [e.g., Bird et al ., ; Giese et al ., ; Paul et al ., ; Allen et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He presumed that all metamorphic units and volcanic‐bearing post‐Triassic strata, including the Hamadan phyllites, are “allochthonous.” The stratigraphic and intrusive superposition of the extensive calc‐alkaline Jurassic volcanics and intrusives of the SSA with pre‐Jurassic rocks, including intrusive relationships of arc batholiths into the pre‐Jurassic substrate (e.g., Figure ), and stratigraphic and structural continuity across the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary reported in many previous studies [e.g., Zahedi , ; Berberian and Berberian , ; Kazmin et al ., ] are not accounted for in the model. Alavi [] also suggested that the thick crust and relatively high mean elevation of the SSA were caused by south directed imbrication of up to 15 km of nappes composed of fragments of the Cretaceous and younger arc (Figure a), as opposed to underthrusting of the leading edge of the Arabian plate advocated by most workers [e.g., Bird et al ., ; Giese et al ., ; Paul et al ., ; Allen et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Early estimates of crustal thickness of the Iranian Plateau beneath the SSA of up to 64 km have been interpreted to indicate a doubling of the crustal thickness from south to north across the Zagros suture [e.g., Dehghani and Makris , ; Giese et al ., , Figure 7]. More recently, several seismic imaging projects across the Zagros orogen were attempted to test the hypothesis of a thick crustal root beneath the SSA.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giese et al (1984) report on refraction profiles recorded from quarry blast sources in southeastern Zagros, but their conclusions are not supported by reverse profiles and the data quality is poor. Hatzfeld et al (2003) used receiver function analysis from earthquake records to infer a crustal thickness of ~46 km beneath a single station in Central Zagros.…”
Section: Previous Data On Zagros Lithospheric Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies of the crustal velocity structure of the Iranian plateau. A refraction profile consisting of sparse recordings along a line from central Iran to the Strait of Hormuz (Giese et al 1984) shows arrivals of questionable quality identified as Moho reflections and indicating a crustal thickness of 40 km beneath central Iran. Using receiver function analysis Hatzfeld et al (2003) find the crust in the central Zagros to be 44–48 km thick.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%