Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
During the Romantic period the English language was, as always, a field of struggle between different interests. Those dominating the professions, institutions, and commerce of writing and print developed a ‘standard’ and ‘national’ form of English that in fact embodied their values and served their interests. This process had two broad aspects, repeated elsewhere in forming nation states: a ‘standard’ written form was consolidated by the late eighteenth century; then a ‘standard’ spoken form was created based on it. This was eventually known as the ‘King's’ or ‘Queen's’ English or ‘received pronunciation’ approved by cultural gatekeepers such as teachers, editors, publishers, critics, and journalists, and, after the Romantic period, state schools, cultural foundations, government departments, and so on. Both the written and spoken ‘standard’ were the social and political instrument of those who invented them, largely the professional middle class who, by the nature of their work, were people of writing, as both experts in various kinds of writing, from sermons to contracts, manuals to legislation, treatises to constitutions, legal briefs to literature. Standard English enabled its possessors, a minority scattered across nation and empire, to constitute themselves as an ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 2006), with similar culture, language, and interests. It enabled them to presume to have a unique cultural and social, and hence political authority. The standard implicitly relegated ‘non‐standard’ Englishes, from regional dialects to class‐based sociolects, to ‘sub‐standard’, and implied that users of ‘non‐standard’ were merely local in identity while possessors of the standard language were a national class. The establishment of ‘national’ standard English implied the existence of a ‘national’ identity, the necessary basis of a nation state and, by extension, of an empire.
During the Romantic period the English language was, as always, a field of struggle between different interests. Those dominating the professions, institutions, and commerce of writing and print developed a ‘standard’ and ‘national’ form of English that in fact embodied their values and served their interests. This process had two broad aspects, repeated elsewhere in forming nation states: a ‘standard’ written form was consolidated by the late eighteenth century; then a ‘standard’ spoken form was created based on it. This was eventually known as the ‘King's’ or ‘Queen's’ English or ‘received pronunciation’ approved by cultural gatekeepers such as teachers, editors, publishers, critics, and journalists, and, after the Romantic period, state schools, cultural foundations, government departments, and so on. Both the written and spoken ‘standard’ were the social and political instrument of those who invented them, largely the professional middle class who, by the nature of their work, were people of writing, as both experts in various kinds of writing, from sermons to contracts, manuals to legislation, treatises to constitutions, legal briefs to literature. Standard English enabled its possessors, a minority scattered across nation and empire, to constitute themselves as an ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 2006), with similar culture, language, and interests. It enabled them to presume to have a unique cultural and social, and hence political authority. The standard implicitly relegated ‘non‐standard’ Englishes, from regional dialects to class‐based sociolects, to ‘sub‐standard’, and implied that users of ‘non‐standard’ were merely local in identity while possessors of the standard language were a national class. The establishment of ‘national’ standard English implied the existence of a ‘national’ identity, the necessary basis of a nation state and, by extension, of an empire.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.