2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-016-9539-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Crucified’ Leader: Cynicism, Fantasies and Paradoxes in Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the neoliberal state, teacher agency matters but only as long as teachers use it to make decisions in the "right," controlled, and expected way (Courtney & Gunther, 2015;Masschelein & Simons, 2013;Taubman, 2009). This paradox reflects what might be called governance from a distance (Rüsselbaek Hansen & Frederiksen, 2017). It also reflects an eclipse of those complex inter-and intrasubjective "realities" within which education comes into being.…”
Section: Taking Agency For Granted In Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the neoliberal state, teacher agency matters but only as long as teachers use it to make decisions in the "right," controlled, and expected way (Courtney & Gunther, 2015;Masschelein & Simons, 2013;Taubman, 2009). This paradox reflects what might be called governance from a distance (Rüsselbaek Hansen & Frederiksen, 2017). It also reflects an eclipse of those complex inter-and intrasubjective "realities" within which education comes into being.…”
Section: Taking Agency For Granted In Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, school leadership cannot be perceived as an unambiguous, given entity. With respect to school leaders and the understanding of school leadership, there are competing and sometimes contradictory discourses (Rüsselbaek Hansen & Frederiksen, 2017).…”
Section: School Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the existing research on the topic is rich and well developed (for example, Clarke, 2012;Richardson, 1997;Taylor, 2005;Van Thiel and Leeuw, 2002), the qualitative consequences of the present reform frenzy are underexposed. This is partly due to the fact that the reform processes are still going on at a more rapid pace than ever before (Rosa, 2010), and they are being struggled over, negotiated, managed and handled every day by the implicated parties -not least by welfare professionals and their leaders (Ru¨sselbaek Hansen and Frederiksen, 2016). Thus, rather than attempting to study what the consequences of the modernization of welfare work have been, we look at the modernization process as it takes place in two carefully chosen examples: upper secondary schools and vocational educational training in Denmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%