2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
1,217
0
60

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,476 publications
(1,360 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
1,217
0
60
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results can inform studies exploring sympatric ranges and niche evolution versus conservatism for related species, where analyses theoretically should be focused at the extent scale at which the phenomena of interest are dominant (Turner et al 2001). In light of our findings and those of Anderson and Raza (2010) and Barve et al (2011), we should be cautious of selecting the extent and recognize that the extent has been accessible to the species of interest over relevant time periods representing the ideal extent for implementing SMDs.…”
Section: Effects Of the Extent Of The Study Region On Predicted Distrmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results can inform studies exploring sympatric ranges and niche evolution versus conservatism for related species, where analyses theoretically should be focused at the extent scale at which the phenomena of interest are dominant (Turner et al 2001). In light of our findings and those of Anderson and Raza (2010) and Barve et al (2011), we should be cautious of selecting the extent and recognize that the extent has been accessible to the species of interest over relevant time periods representing the ideal extent for implementing SMDs.…”
Section: Effects Of the Extent Of The Study Region On Predicted Distrmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The selection of an appropriate extent which is relevant for all correlative SDMs employing background, pseudo-absence, or absence data (Bahn and McGill 2007;Barve et al 2011;Chefaoui and Lobo 2008) may help resolve debates regarding model generality/transferability across space and time (e.g., Duncan et al 2009). Our results support the hypothesis that SDMs predict differently when different methods of defining the extent are used (Anderson and Raza 2010;Barve et al 2011;VanDerWal et al 2009). Of the two methods applied here, Anderson and Raza (2010) found that method 2 performed better than method 1; models using method 2 at narrower extents predicted larger suitable areas which were less concentrated in regions surrounding species' localities, as well as higher interpredictivity.…”
Section: Effects Of the Extent Of The Study Region On Predicted Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations