2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45192-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crossover Closure and Partial Match Detection

Abstract: Abstract.The crossover closure generation rule characterizes the generalization achieved by artificial immune systems using partial match detection. The paper reviews earlier results and extends the previously introduced notion of crossover closure to encompass additional match rules. For concreteness, the discussion focuses on r-chunks matching, giving alternative ways that detectors can be used to implement the crossover closure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Esponda et al (2003b) developed a formal framework for analyzing positive and negative detection under various matching criteria. They discussed in depth the idea of crossover closure (Balthrop et al, 2002;Esponda et al, 2003a), which obviously has some root in genetic algorithm. The problem addressed is to derive some means for inductively determining the underlying concept from a collection of instances.…”
Section: Analysis Of Detector Coveragementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esponda et al (2003b) developed a formal framework for analyzing positive and negative detection under various matching criteria. They discussed in depth the idea of crossover closure (Balthrop et al, 2002;Esponda et al, 2003a), which obviously has some root in genetic algorithm. The problem addressed is to derive some means for inductively determining the underlying concept from a collection of instances.…”
Section: Analysis Of Detector Coveragementioning
confidence: 98%
“…One-class classification (Esponda et al, 2003a). Although the goal is to discriminate between two classes, samples from only one class (self or normal) are available to train the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a r-contiguous detector can be decomposed into ℓ − r + 1 overlapping r-chunk detectors, r-chunk is considered as a simplification of the r contiguous n matching rule [21]. It has been showed in Ref.…”
Section: Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are undesirable to the extent that they lead to false negatives if non-self samples are falling into them. Balthrop et al [28] and Esponda et al [86,87] pointed out that matching rules are one reason of inducing holes. For example, the r-contiguous bit matching rule induces either length-limited holes or crossover holes, while the r-chunks matching rule only induces crossover holes.…”
Section: Detector Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%