2011
DOI: 10.2478/s12175-011-0038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crossing number of G ▭ C n for the graph G on six vertices

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The crossing numbers of Cartesian products of paths, cycles or stars with all graphs of order at most four are known. The crossing numbers of G C n for some graphs G on five and six vertices and the cycle C n are also given. In this paper, we extend these results by determining the crossing number of the Cartesian product G C n , where G is a specific graph on six vertices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, it is not difficult to verify that the conditions (2), ( 3) and ( 4), (5) are fulfilled for the drawing of H 1 in Figure 8 the number of crossings in (7) confirms a contradiction with the assumption in D for all n at least 4. For n = 3, we obtain also the contradiction with the number of crossings in D except for the case of the drawing of H 1 in Figure 8 (a) with T 1 , T 2 ∈ R 0 and T 3 by which the edges of H 1 are crossed exactly once, but the same discussion as in Case 1 forces at least 11 crossings in D again.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, it is not difficult to verify that the conditions (2), ( 3) and ( 4), (5) are fulfilled for the drawing of H 1 in Figure 8 the number of crossings in (7) confirms a contradiction with the assumption in D for all n at least 4. For n = 3, we obtain also the contradiction with the number of crossings in D except for the case of the drawing of H 1 in Figure 8 (a) with T 1 , T 2 ∈ R 0 and T 3 by which the edges of H 1 are crossed exactly once, but the same discussion as in Case 1 forces at least 11 crossings in D again.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The crossing numbers of the join products of the paths and the cycles with all graphs of order at most four have been well-known for a long time by M. Klešč [10,11], and M. Klešč and Š. Schr ötter [14], and therefore it is understandable that our immediate goal is to establish the exact values for the crossing numbers of G + P n and G + C n also for all graphs G of order five and six. Of course, the crossing numbers of G + P n and G + C n are already known for a lot of graphs G of order five and six (see [3,5,6,9,12,15,[17][18][19][20]24]). In all these cases, the graph G is connected and contains usually at least one cycle.…”
Section: © Staš M 2023mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ensuing years, significant effort has gone into extending these results to include graphs on more vertices; in particular five and six vertices. The pioneering work in this area was by Klešč and his various co-authors [6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] who have spent the last three decades handling these cases, often on a graph-by-graph basis, requiring ad-hoc proofs that exploit the specific graph structure of the graphs in question. In the last fifteen years, a large number of other researchers have also contributed to this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 46 P n . Of course, this kind of approach is only useful when the upper bound coincides with an established lower bound for a subgraph.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7],the values of crossing numbers for sevetal Cartesian products of cycles and six-edge graphs G on six vertices are presented. In [7] and [5] are given the crossing numbers for Cartesian products of cycles and two seven-edge graphs G on six vertices. In this paper, we give the crossing number of the Cartesian products G 2C n for two graphs G on six vertices and fixed number n.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%