1979
DOI: 10.1177/009365027900600301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cross-Situational Consistency of Communicative Behaviors

Abstract: Cappella for their ideas and criticisms.Personality traits are widely employed as antecedent variables in the explanation of communicative behaviors. This study explored the legitimacy of the use of traits by focusing on the conceptual and empirical justification for one assumption of the trait approach: "cross-situational consistency. " This assumption was not supported for the traits of "reticence" or 'predisposition toward verbal behavior." Evidence also raised questions concerning the general validity of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included measures of self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1965), verbal reticence (Lustig, 1974(Lustig, ,1977, extroversion (Eysenck, 1958), trait anxiety (Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1969): and predisposition toward verbal behavior (Mortensen et al, 1977). The conceptual relevance of these constructs to the generalized predisposition has been established by Mortensen, Arntson, and Lustig (1977), McCroskey (1977McCroskey ( , 1978, Burgoon and Burgoon (1974), and Hewes and Haight (1979). Correlational data supplied by Daly (1978aDaly ( , 1978b) strongly suggest the empirical comparability of many highly similar measures (including the verbal reticence scale used here), while data obtained by Hewes et al (1976) indicate the empirical similarity of the scales employed here.1°…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These included measures of self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1965), verbal reticence (Lustig, 1974(Lustig, ,1977, extroversion (Eysenck, 1958), trait anxiety (Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1969): and predisposition toward verbal behavior (Mortensen et al, 1977). The conceptual relevance of these constructs to the generalized predisposition has been established by Mortensen, Arntson, and Lustig (1977), McCroskey (1977McCroskey ( , 1978, Burgoon and Burgoon (1974), and Hewes and Haight (1979). Correlational data supplied by Daly (1978aDaly ( , 1978b) strongly suggest the empirical comparability of many highly similar measures (including the verbal reticence scale used here), while data obtained by Hewes et al (1976) indicate the empirical similarity of the scales employed here.1°…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…A test of equality between these two figures resulted in a rejection of the null hypothesis @<.03, power -.99 for a= .05 and medium effects size). Certainly these comparisons of the magnitudes of r(tb,) and P(bij) suggest the comparability of Daly's behavioral indices with those found in Hewes and Haight (1979). The higher internal consistency for the self-reports in our data is a desirable property from the standpoint of traditional trait theories (Cattell, 1966;Mischel, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of cross-situational consistency, which Bern and Allen (1974) argue is synonymous with the concept of personality, establishes a criterion for explaining phe-71 CSMC nomena according to personality characteristics. But findings show that persons are not consistent across various social situations with regard to traits and behavior (Hewes & Haight, 1979). The transactional approach assumes that human behavior is explained by an interaction of person, media, and socialenvironmental variables, and the general social-psychological literature shows personby-situation interactions to be more successful in explaining human behavior than individual or situational variables alone (Bowers, 1973;Endler & Hunt, 1976).…”
Section: Ms Rouner Is Assistant Professor Of Communication Clevelanmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Associating similarity in media-use behavior in parallel situations, or "longitudinal" consistency, with cross-situational consistency, or personality consistency (Hewes & Haight, 1979) may have led to misconstruing how regularly people behave in television news viewing. The idea of cross-situational consistency, which Bern and Allen (1974) argue is synonymous with the concept of personality, establishes a criterion for explaining phe-71 CSMC nomena according to personality characteristics.…”
Section: Ms Rouner Is Assistant Professor Of Communication Clevelanmentioning
confidence: 99%