2016
DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cross‐Market Spillover of Economic Shocks through Multimarket Banks

Abstract: This study investigates the mortgage lending of banks operating in multiple U.S. metropolitan areas during the housing market collapse of 2007–09. We show that multimarket banks reduced local portfolio lending in response to high overall mortgage delinquencies in their other markets, consistent with the view that local economic shocks can be transmitted to other regions through banks’ internal capital markets. This spillover was greatest when the bank lacked a branch presence and when the market was highly per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 10% decline in house prices in a bank's markets is found to reduce small business lending by 25% when this non-local lending is included. The magnified effect is similar to Berrospide et al (2016), who find that exposed banks cut mortgage lending the most in areas in which they didn't have a branch.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A 10% decline in house prices in a bank's markets is found to reduce small business lending by 25% when this non-local lending is included. The magnified effect is similar to Berrospide et al (2016), who find that exposed banks cut mortgage lending the most in areas in which they didn't have a branch.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…I address this bias with geographically disaggregated lending data in the spirit of Huang and Stephens (2015); Bord et al (2014); Berrospide et al (2016). Namely, I estimate bankcounty lending as in equation 1, using the multimarket exposure of a bank to weak real estate markets to measure Shock b , and either county level real estate shocks or county fixed effects to control for η c .…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations