Left Legalism/Left Critique 2002
DOI: 10.1215/9780822383871-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Critique of Rights in Critical Legal Studies

Abstract: This piece presents a critique, developed by a faction of the group that called itself critical legal studies, of rights as they figure in legal and general political discourse. This rights critique, like critical legal studies in general, operates at the uneasy juncture of two distinct, sometimes complementary and sometimes conflicting enterprises, which I will call the left and the modernist/postmodernist projects. 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This critique of rights is fundamental different from that presented in Critical Legal Studies [48] or those presenting moral or ontological claims about rights [6]. Marx argues that documents like the 'rights of man' casts claims to property and liberty as natural and entrenches certain social powers in civil society.…”
Section: Critique Of Legal Rightsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This critique of rights is fundamental different from that presented in Critical Legal Studies [48] or those presenting moral or ontological claims about rights [6]. Marx argues that documents like the 'rights of man' casts claims to property and liberty as natural and entrenches certain social powers in civil society.…”
Section: Critique Of Legal Rightsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…185 See discussion in Zemans (1983); Eskridge (2001: 454-8); Yeazell (2004Yeazell ( : 1990; Siegel (2006Siegel ( : 1333; Simmons (2009: 139). 186 See, prominently, Tushnet (1989); Kennedy (2002), (2004: 9-11). development of democracy, and the preparedness of citizens to pursue litigation typically indicates both deepening democratic institutionalization and socially proportioned multiplication of democratic agency.…”
Section: Democracy and Legal Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering how many scholars have critiqued rights litigation and human rights activism as potential distractions from struggles for social change, it is remarkable how few have seen ATS litigation in a similar light. Critics of rights litigation have claimed that it can lead activists to develop a misplaced faith in the “myth of rights” (Scheingold 1974, 5), allow lawyers and rights discourse to coopt and deradicalize a movement (Gabel 1984; Tushnet 1984; Kennedy 2002), or place “hollow hope” in the ability of courts actually to implement social change (Rosenberg 1991). Critics of human rights activism, for their part, have argued it can construct depoliticized and individualized legal subjects (Kennedy 2004); promote notions of the state as savage, victims as powerless, and cause lawyers as morally superior saviors (Mutua 2002); and replace class-based utopian visions with an ostensibly apolitical legal utopia (Moyn 2010).…”
Section: Litigation As Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%