1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01150.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The critical thermal limits for the stone loach, Noemacheilus barbatulus, from three populations in north‐west England

Abstract: I 1. The chief objective was to determine the upper and lower thermal limits for feeding and survival in the stone loach, Noemacheilus barbatulus, using juveniles (total length 30-45 mm, live weight 0.25-0.80 g) from one population and adults (total length 77-100mm, live weight 3.6-7.9g) from three populations. 2. Fish were acclimatized to constant temperatures of 3, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 27°C; then the temperature was changed at a rate of rC/30min to determine the critical limits for feeding, survival over 7 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some studies have failed to show thermal tolerance differences in populations from thermally contrasting environments (Brown and Feldmeth, 1971;Elliott et al, 1994;Smale and Rabeni, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some studies have failed to show thermal tolerance differences in populations from thermally contrasting environments (Brown and Feldmeth, 1971;Elliott et al, 1994;Smale and Rabeni, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTmax was defined as the point at which ventilation (flaring of the gills) ceased. CTmin was defined as the point at which the righting response was lost; this is a traditional measure of thermal stress tolerance in physiological zoology (Prosser 1973;Bulger and Schultz 1979;Fields et al 1987;ForsterBlouin 1989;Elliot et al 1994;Elliot and Elliot 1995;Meffe et al 1995). Thermal stress was continued until half the individuals in a trial had reached the critical thermal limit (analogous to an LD50).…”
Section: Selection Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model shows that the slower the rate of temperature change, the smaller the difference is between estimates of the upper incipient lethal temperature and the critical thermal maximum. Although their model was found to be a poor fit to the data from the preliminary experiments of the present study and to similar data for stone loach (Elliott et al, 1994), their logic is still applicable and therefore the lethal temperature at the origin in Fig. 1 should provide an estimate of the highest upper incipient lethal temperature (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%