2018
DOI: 10.1080/19407963.2018.1516076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The critical role of a lead institution in ecotourism management: a case of dual governance in Belum-Temengor, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J. van Beukering, Scherl, et al, 2007;Yusof, Muda, Amin, & Ibrahim, 2013). Future research on conservation tourism governance in Raja Ampat can learn from challenges experienced in other countries, such as Malaysia, Thailand, and The Philippines, such as ambiguous and overlapping regulations, inconsistencies with local settings (Hussin, Kunjuraman, & Weirowski, 2015;Oracion, Miller, & Christie, 2005;Thuy, 2016), transparency and accountability (Mohammed, 2010), exclusion of locals from decision-making in planning (Johari, Ramachandran, Shuib, & Herman, 2015), and poor coordination in multi-actor and multilevel governance (Gan, Nair, & Hamzah, 2019;Marzuki, Rofe, & Mohd Hashim, 2014). Others point to rising equity challenges resulting from marine conservation tourism issues, including power dissymmetry among local actors in decision-making (Gier, Christie, & Amolo, 2017), equitable cost and benefit-sharing at different governance levels (Othman & Zin, 2013), differences in benefits between conservation tourism actors (Ariffin & Yen, 2017;Pusiran & Xiao, 2013) and between localities in conservation tourism destinations (van Beukering, Cacatian, Stellinga, Sultanian, & Leisher, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. van Beukering, Scherl, et al, 2007;Yusof, Muda, Amin, & Ibrahim, 2013). Future research on conservation tourism governance in Raja Ampat can learn from challenges experienced in other countries, such as Malaysia, Thailand, and The Philippines, such as ambiguous and overlapping regulations, inconsistencies with local settings (Hussin, Kunjuraman, & Weirowski, 2015;Oracion, Miller, & Christie, 2005;Thuy, 2016), transparency and accountability (Mohammed, 2010), exclusion of locals from decision-making in planning (Johari, Ramachandran, Shuib, & Herman, 2015), and poor coordination in multi-actor and multilevel governance (Gan, Nair, & Hamzah, 2019;Marzuki, Rofe, & Mohd Hashim, 2014). Others point to rising equity challenges resulting from marine conservation tourism issues, including power dissymmetry among local actors in decision-making (Gier, Christie, & Amolo, 2017), equitable cost and benefit-sharing at different governance levels (Othman & Zin, 2013), differences in benefits between conservation tourism actors (Ariffin & Yen, 2017;Pusiran & Xiao, 2013) and between localities in conservation tourism destinations (van Beukering, Cacatian, Stellinga, Sultanian, & Leisher, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in addition to natural preconditions and local initiative, a leading institution (government) has a critical role to play in building and managing an effective and sustainable ecotourism system, e.g., by promoting the region, regulating tourism flows, and solving problematic issues (i.e., waste management) [91,92].…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies conducted in the samples of local residents and other stakeholders conclude that ecotourism in protected areas generates income and yields benefits for local residents (Baker 1997;Green & Higginbottom 2000;Landell-Mills & Porras 2002;Christ, Hillel, Matus & Sweeting, 2004;Ezebilo & Mattsson 2010;Gan, Nair & Hamzah, 2019;Mu, Nepal & Lai 2019;Puri, Karanth & Thapa. 2019;Tretiakova, Brankov, Petrović, Syromiatnikova, Radovanović & Yakovlev, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%