1972
DOI: 10.3109/00048677209159689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crisis of Hysterectomy

Abstract: SYNOPSISThis paper provides a review of relevant literature on the outcome of hysterectomy and on affective, defensive, cognitive, reality and object relations aspects of the hysterectomy crisis. The development, from the literature review and from the pilot study, of the research instrument, the Hysterectomy Interview Schedule is described. Parameters of response in terms of significant interactions are recorded for 100 subjects. It is concluded that women experience as helpful supportive relationships which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of the discussion, it is useful to consider hysterectomy as a crisis in a women's life (Raphael 1972;Kaltreider 1979). Such a crisis reverberates on many aspects (self-concept, sexual and marital adjustment, activities), and, as in any important crisis, the quality of support around the woman and the reaction of her environment is of crucial importance to moderate the stress of this intervention (Cobb 1976;Jackson 1985), which would rank 18th on a scale from one to 61 on the Paykel Scale of Life Events (Paykel 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of the discussion, it is useful to consider hysterectomy as a crisis in a women's life (Raphael 1972;Kaltreider 1979). Such a crisis reverberates on many aspects (self-concept, sexual and marital adjustment, activities), and, as in any important crisis, the quality of support around the woman and the reaction of her environment is of crucial importance to moderate the stress of this intervention (Cobb 1976;Jackson 1985), which would rank 18th on a scale from one to 61 on the Paykel Scale of Life Events (Paykel 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%