The Criminalization of Muslims in the United States, 2016

Abstract

The criminalization of Muslims-framing an Islamic religious identity as a problem to be solved using state crime control logic-is undeniably in process in the United States. Local, state, and federal statutes target Muslims for surveillance and exclusion, and media sources depict Muslims as synonymous with terrorism, as others have shown. This paper analyzes the public's role in the criminalization of Islam, which I call "cr-Islamization." Drawing on in-depth, qualitative interviews in a major Southwest city during the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, I detail how the majority of 144 politically, racially, and economically diverse interviewees talk about Muslims as a potential "racial threat," using "fear of crime" language indicative of the mass incarceration era. This suggests that criminalization theory should be central to sociological studies of Muslims in the contemporary United States, and that criminalization rhetoric remains powerful, despite mainstream enthusiasm for criminal justice reform. I argue that criminalization's power might reside in its ability to mutate in the "post-racial" era. The mechanisms supporting crimmigration, the criminalization of black Americans, and cr-Islamization are related but not identical. Muslims are religiously and racially subjugated, but more economically secure compared to other criminalized groups. This paper's findings should prompt scholars to re-examine the relationships between racialization, criminalization, religious subjugation, and economic exploitation in the twenty-first century United States.

Relationships, resources, and political empowerment: community violence intervention strategies that contest the logics of policing and incarceration

“…This idea is premised on the existence of an outside society that would be safe, non-violent, and healthy if it were not plagued by criminals, who are often portrayed as "bad people" by nature and thus not worthy of dignity and humane treatment. This dualismbetween responsible citizens and dangerous criminals, between good and bad people-has been produced and maintained through racist and xenophobic ideologies in which racial and ethnic others are seen to threaten an idealized white public (50)(51)(52). This logic of the isolation of deviant individuals obscures the structural realities through which violence pervades U.S. society.…”

Feminist march of 8M and COVID-19

“…Nevertheless, criminalization is not only articulated from the legal and political dimensions of the institutional framework, with actions such as the delegitimization of social actors in protest, the physical repression of security forces on protesters, the establishment of regulatory frameworks that allow the deliberate prosecution of particular collective actions, the counterposition of rights in the exercise of social protest or the criminal prosecution of its participants (Alvarado, 2020). The fact is that the intervention of media systems is also often required for the symbolic construction of specific frames of interpretation on the discourses of resistance and its manifestations in the public space, as recognized by the research of Nacos and Torres-Reyna (2003), Artese (2009), Ferrell et al (2015, Menjívar (2016) and Kaufman (2019). Generally, the phenomenon of criminalization of social protest through the media has two fundamental characteristics.…”

Criminalization or instrumentalism? New trends in the field of border criminology

“…By contrast, the third manifestation of instrumentalism changes is markedly different. It affects counter-terrorism strategies (see Golash-Boza, 2016; Kaufman, 2019), a field significantly more salient and worrisome than that of everyday policing. Official data taken from the annual Europol Terrorism-Situation and Trend Reports (hereinafter TE-SAT) 13 show that terrorism acts and especially counter-terrorism tactics have remarkably shifted in Europe over the last decade, at least in two crucial ways.…”