2003
DOI: 10.1080/1561426032000059187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crime triangle: Alcohol, drug use, and vandalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Baker and Wolfer (2003) study, the residents living near the park were significantly more likely than comparison group residents to report being the victims of vandalism or seeing public drinking. However, after the intervention, the victimization rates for the target area had declined to the point where there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Baker and Wolfer (2003) study, the residents living near the park were significantly more likely than comparison group residents to report being the victims of vandalism or seeing public drinking. However, after the intervention, the victimization rates for the target area had declined to the point where there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“… POP in a suburban Pennsylvania park (Baker & Wolfer, 2003) POP in Jersey City violent crime places (Braga, Weisburd, Waring, Green Mazerolle, Spelman, & Gajewski, 1999) Knoxville Public Safety Collaborative (Knoxville Police Department, 2002) Oakland Beat Health program (Mazerolle, Price, & Roehl, 2000b) Minneapolis Repeat Call Address Policing (RECAP) (Sherman, Buerger, & Gartin, 1989) Philadelphia Safe Travel To and From School Program (Stokes, Donahue, Caron, & Greene, 1996) Atlanta Problem‐Oriented Policing Approach to Drug Enforcement Project (Stone, 1993) San Diego Coordinated Agency Network project (C.A.N.) (Thomas, 1998) United Kingdom National Reassurance Policing Programme (Tuffin, Morris, & Poole, 2006) Jersey City Drug Market Analysis Project (Weisburd & Green, 1995) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two uncontrolled studies also showed reductions in fear of crime: one study of a police-led intervention in a crime ‘hot spot’ in a park in Pennsylvania, PA, USA (29.8% [47]) a , and the other study in a public transport setting in New York City (21% [50]), although significance was not reported. One further uncontrolled study of an intervention focusing on road closures in Dayton, OH, USA, showed a non-significant trend toward reduced fear (6% [48]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a The Pennsylvania, PA, USA, study [47] was conceived as a controlled design, but is treated in this review as uncontrolled because the comparison group appear to have benefited from the intervention as much as the ‘intervention’ group.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of ten rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental studies found that the strategy is generally successful in reducing crime and disorder, though the effects tend to be modest overall . 9 A number of studies have examined the application of POP to hot spots (Baker and Wolfer 2003;Braga et al 1999;Braga and Bond 2008;Mazerolle et al 2000;Weisburd and Green 1995), and most of these have shown that the efforts reduced some forms of crime and disorder (also see Braga 2007 andWeisburd et al 2010). 10 Results have been more mixed with respect to violent crime-interventions studied by Mazerolle et al (2000), Green (1995), for example, did not reduce violence-but only one rigorous study of POP and hot spots has focused specifically on hot spots of violent crime.…”
Section: Problem-oriented Policing At Hot Spotsmentioning
confidence: 99%