2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.834024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cretaceous Normal Superchron: A Mini-Review of Its Discovery, Short Reversal Events, Paleointensity, Paleosecular Variations, Paleoenvironment, Volcanism, and Mechanism

Abstract: The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (CNS) was first defined in the 1960s to explain the Cretaceous Quiet Zone in marine magnetic anomaly profiles, which includes no or fewer geomagnetic reversals. This ∼37 million years period is considered the most unique and extreme geomagnetic feature for the last 160 Myr. Superchrons may be caused by the geodynamo operating at peak efficiency with a unique heat flux at the core-mantle boundary (CMB). Previous studies suggest that the CNS is a sign of the connection between Ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geomagnetic polarity during the CNS was oriented in normal direction (Ogg, 2020), even though short reversal events may have existed (Yoshimura, 2022). Hence, the presence of remanent magnetization in our study area would amplify the magnetic signal in the same direction.…”
Section: High Magnetization In the Lower Crustmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Geomagnetic polarity during the CNS was oriented in normal direction (Ogg, 2020), even though short reversal events may have existed (Yoshimura, 2022). Hence, the presence of remanent magnetization in our study area would amplify the magnetic signal in the same direction.…”
Section: High Magnetization In the Lower Crustmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The long CNS lasted ~37 Myr, ending at about 83 Myr (He et al 2012). Some brief reversed polarity intervals may exist at the end of the CNS but have yet to be confirmed worldwide (Yoshimura 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since different geomagnetic field behaviors entail different geodynamo processes, the nature of the geodynamo during superchrons remain elusive as well. The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (CNS, ∼121 Ma to ∼84 Ma), which exhibits an almost uniform normal polarity for nearly 40 Myrs, offers a prime example to unravel the enigma of the geodynamo during a superchron (e.g., Yoshimura, 2022). Also, during the CNS, extensive formation of large igneous provinces (LIPs), widespread ocean anoxia, multiple biotic turnovers and large global carbon perturbations occurred (Jenkyns, 2010; Larson, 1991; Leckie et al., 2002), indicating an interval of upheaval of the entire Earth system from its interior (geodynamo) to surficial processes (marine environmental changes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%