“…The idea of the promotion of social inclusion by creative economy has been highlighted in the debate about the formulation and implementation of public policies in several countries, including peripheral ones, and international institutions such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and UNCTAD. Some pre-given and homogenizing formulas, present in initial reports produced by these institutions about the implementation of the creative economy in several countries and strengthened by many North Atlantic academics, came up against totally different political, economic and cultural realities, so that the development of the creative sectors that happened in certain countries would be unfeasible in others, given the incompatibility of the particularities and specificities of these societies in relation to the recommendations that came from international bodies (Vlassis & Beukelaer, 2019). The stimulus to innovation and originality of the fundamental ideas for the development of creative sectors, for example, should be enhanced, according to Venturelli (2000), by public policies at different social levels, leading to the structuring of an educational system that emphasizes creative freedom and independent thinking, as well as state and private investments in research and development of new ideas and technologies and the search for risk reduction for creative enterprises.…”