1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1972.tb01566.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cranial Base in Trisomy 21

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not all of these differences have a direct effect on speech production, they offer a starting point for discussing speech production abilities in individuals with Down syndrome. For example, absent and/or reduced bone growth in the bones of the head and face has implications for attachment locations and support of muscles used during speech production (Frostad, Chleall, & Melosky, 1971; Kisling, 1966; Roche, Roche, & Lewis, 1972; Sanger, 1975). Poorly differentiated midface muscles and/or additional facial muscles may contribute to difficulties with articulation (Bersu, 1976, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not all of these differences have a direct effect on speech production, they offer a starting point for discussing speech production abilities in individuals with Down syndrome. For example, absent and/or reduced bone growth in the bones of the head and face has implications for attachment locations and support of muscles used during speech production (Frostad, Chleall, & Melosky, 1971; Kisling, 1966; Roche, Roche, & Lewis, 1972; Sanger, 1975). Poorly differentiated midface muscles and/or additional facial muscles may contribute to difficulties with articulation (Bersu, 1976, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%