2003
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226065694.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Craft of Research, 2nd edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To derive to the sample figure of 173 households from the known population, the researcher used this formula [9] (Booth et al, 2003):…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive to the sample figure of 173 households from the known population, the researcher used this formula [9] (Booth et al, 2003):…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we take no strong position on the relative merits of qualitative and quantitative methods, we suggest that claims from either genre are often goal directed, that is, intended to influence actions (e.g., by teachers), beliefs about learning or teaching, or education policies. For that reason, we emphasize the role of argumentation in extending the design of structured abstracts, building on work by Toulmin (1958) and Toulmin, Reike, and Janik (1997), as modified by Booth, Colomb, and Williams (1995) and Stokes (1997).…”
Section: Argumentative Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claims are linked to data by a credible and appropriate warrant . In education research, the action of the warrant is borne by relevant methods, which in turn have satisfactory backing: a valued and appropriate methodology (e.g., Booth et al, 1995; Kelly, 2004). Because claims from any single study are assailable, the claims should include stated qualifiers and exceptions .…”
Section: Argumentative Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van de Ven's Engaged Scholarship leads us to our third recommended reading, The Craft of Research by Booth, Colomb and Williams [14]. This is the book Purdue engineering education colleagues Ruth Streveler and Demetra Evangelou are using in the engineering education inquiry PhD course.…”
Section: The Craft Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%