2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cradle to gate life-cycle assessment of thermoelectric materials: A comparison of inorganic, organic and hybrid types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type benefits from high electrical conductivity but suffers from rigidity, scarcity, and toxicity [65]. In addition, based on the life cycle impact assessment of Soleimani et al [66], it is proved that the inorganic type causes significantly greater environmental impacts than the other two types due to its extremely energy-intensive manufacturing processes. Accordingly, there is a growing interest to switch from the inorganic TE materials to the organic ones, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and conductive/non-conductive polymers.…”
Section: Color In Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type benefits from high electrical conductivity but suffers from rigidity, scarcity, and toxicity [65]. In addition, based on the life cycle impact assessment of Soleimani et al [66], it is proved that the inorganic type causes significantly greater environmental impacts than the other two types due to its extremely energy-intensive manufacturing processes. Accordingly, there is a growing interest to switch from the inorganic TE materials to the organic ones, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and conductive/non-conductive polymers.…”
Section: Color In Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, wearable TEGs are considered as a renewable alternative for fossil-fuel based power generations. Although a few studies carried out life cycle impact assessment of TE materials [66] and TEGs [173][174] from a specific perspective, but this part is heavily neglected in the existing research on wearable TEGs. Therefore, as part of the sustainability criteria for future technologies, the environmental performance of wearable TEGs requires careful attention.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of heavy metals and rare-earth elements in the constituent materials, attention has been paid to their toxicity, with less work focusing on their supply-chain environmental profile. However, Soleimani et al conducted a comparative lifecycle impacts of inorganic, organic and hybrid thermoelectric materials at their production stage, across multiple environmental indicators namely resource consumption, emission, waste, primary energy demand, and global warming potential [534]. The authors concluded that the inorganic type yielded significantly higher environmental impacts in comparison to the other two due to the energy-intensive nature of their manufacturing processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full design from the synthesis of materials to the fabrication of devices must be assessed [11,12]. For many applications such as powering sensors or for Peltier coolers, good room temperature thermoelectrics are needed [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%