2006
DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.1282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cow That Stole Christmas: Framing the First U.S. Mad Cow Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Politicians were used both times, as were doctors and special interest groups. However, in the second study, doctors were used more often than watchdog groups, which is at odds with previous research (Anderson, 2000;Eyck, 2000;Ashlock et al, 2006). Food safety experts were used seven times in the 2008 outbreak, but only once in the 2009 outbreak.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Politicians were used both times, as were doctors and special interest groups. However, in the second study, doctors were used more often than watchdog groups, which is at odds with previous research (Anderson, 2000;Eyck, 2000;Ashlock et al, 2006). Food safety experts were used seven times in the 2008 outbreak, but only once in the 2009 outbreak.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The categories on this sheet were loosely based on a study conducted by Ashlock et al (2006) that covered the mad cow crisis. The sheet included the network, the total number of words in the story, the air date of the story, types of sources used, the overall tone of the story (positive, negative, or neutral), and prominent frame(s).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues such as political power, social security, foreign policy, and immigration reform are among this list (Provalis Research, n.d.). Agricultural issues are no exception, they too have also been subjected to these analyses, issues such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (Ashlock, Cartmell, & Kelemen, 2006), salmonella in salsa ingredients (Irlbeck & Akers, 2010), organic food labeling (Klintman & Boström, 2004), and cultured meat (Goodwin & Shoulders, 2013) have been analyzed.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex stories like the December 2003 BSE event lie outside the everyday experience of most reporters and require knowledge beyond their usual areas of expertise. The identification of knowledgeable sources and the scrupulous attribution of the information they provide are crucial to the accurate telling of such science-intensive stories; reporters must identify and accurately report the "right" sources to explain such matters to their read-Research ers (Albaek, Christiansen, & Togeby, 2003;Ashlock, Cartmell & Kelemen, 2006;Borchelt, 2008;Irlbeck, 2009;Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Introduction and Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that opinion leaders help define those issues about which the public should think (Dearing & Rogers, 1996;McCombs & Shaw, 1976;McQuail, 1994) and that the media helps communicate such agenda salience (Ashlock, Cartmell & Kelemen, 2006;Holland, 2009;Peters et al, 2008). Reporters' selection of sources plays an important part in agenda setting because story sources can drive issue discussion in particular directions.…”
Section: Introduction and Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%