2022
DOI: 10.3386/w30569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Covid-19 Baby Bump: The Unexpected Increase in U.S. Fertility Rates in Response to the Pandemic

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as proof-of-concept of application of HIPPS to N3C data, we generated 3 types of cohorts of pregnant persons, ranging from all episodes regardless of precision in gestational age (cohort 1) to a cohort with week-level precision for gestational age and defined outcome (cohort 3), and compared sociodemographic, clinical, and COVID-19 variables across the cohorts. Our cohorts were similar (age, race/ethnicity) to national statistics on live births (2019–2021) and CDC surveillance data on COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, 30 , 31 demonstrating our results are consistent with national demographics. Furthermore, the distribution of gestational ages for live birth are similarly asymmetrical to the national distribution with a mode of 39 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, as proof-of-concept of application of HIPPS to N3C data, we generated 3 types of cohorts of pregnant persons, ranging from all episodes regardless of precision in gestational age (cohort 1) to a cohort with week-level precision for gestational age and defined outcome (cohort 3), and compared sociodemographic, clinical, and COVID-19 variables across the cohorts. Our cohorts were similar (age, race/ethnicity) to national statistics on live births (2019–2021) and CDC surveillance data on COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, 30 , 31 demonstrating our results are consistent with national demographics. Furthermore, the distribution of gestational ages for live birth are similarly asymmetrical to the national distribution with a mode of 39 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As social life contracted in 2020, both scholars and lay social theorists speculated about its impacts on sexual and intimate life. Heterogenous predictions guided early empirical work on the topic, including the anticipation of a baby boom propelled by increased sex between couples (Bailey, Currie, and Schwandt 2022;Carpenter 2020;Ullah et al 2020), a decrease in casual sex (Döring 2020), an increase in divorce rates (Dvorak 2020), greater masturbation (Padgett 2020), and higher consumption of pornography and participation in virtual sex (Banerjee and Sathyanarayana Rao 2021;Grubbs et al 2022;Mestre-Bach, Blycker, and Potenza 2020). Although quarantine measures increased the opportunities for sexual self-exploration for some, it eroded resources essential for sexual health and psychological well-being for vulnerable populations, including women, LGBTQ people, and sex workers (Hall et al 2020;Platt et al 2020).…”
Section: Covid and Sexuality: The "How" And "How Much" Of Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less career disruption can lead to a greater union wage premium among females than males in the long run. As the economy recovered from the pandemic‐led recession, a “mini baby boom” or “baby bump” occurred in 2021 (Bailey et al, 2022). These new mothers might have experienced an even greater union wage premium than new fathers, if unions offered employment security as well as paid maternity leave to those working mothers.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%