1983
DOI: 10.1109/tit.1983.1056679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The covering radius of the<tex>(2^{15}, 16)</tex>Reed-Muller code is at least 16276

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This lower bound can only be achieved for even values of n. When n is odd, the lowest achievable value of L(f) is unknown in the general case: there always exist some functions with L(f) = 2 (n+1)/2 and this value corresponds to the minimum possible nonlinearity for any n ≤ 7. On the other hand some functions with L(f) = 27 32 2 (n+1)/2 are known for any odd n ≥ 15 [20,21]. From now on, we will focus on highly nonlinear Boolean functions in the following sense: Definition 3.…”
Section: Definition 2 the Nonlinearity Of A Boolean Function F With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower bound can only be achieved for even values of n. When n is odd, the lowest achievable value of L(f) is unknown in the general case: there always exist some functions with L(f) = 2 (n+1)/2 and this value corresponds to the minimum possible nonlinearity for any n ≤ 7. On the other hand some functions with L(f) = 27 32 2 (n+1)/2 are known for any odd n ≥ 15 [20,21]. From now on, we will focus on highly nonlinear Boolean functions in the following sense: Definition 3.…”
Section: Definition 2 the Nonlinearity Of A Boolean Function F With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general case, we know [11] where the lower bound, called the quadratic bound, is notably tight for m 2 f3; 5; 7g [4], [12], [13]. On the other hand, it is known that (1; m) 2 m01 0 (27=32)2 when m 15 [14], [15].…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity is 2 6 − 2 3 = 56 which is optimal among 7-bit Boolean functions, see [18]. The additve autocorrelation is optimal, given by ∆ f = 2 (7+1)/2 = 16.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Kasami-dillonmentioning
confidence: 99%