2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The covariance between the number of accidents and the number of victims in multivariate analysis of accident related outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different approaches can be used for collision severity analysis: (a) incorporating severity into the collision frequency models by modeling collisions classified by severity types [31][32][33][34]; and (b) modeling the conditional probability of each severity level for a given collision [14,15,17,35,36]. In this research, we adopted the second approach for three reasons: (i) different factors could have different effects on collision occurrence and severity (e.g., seat belt use has nothing to do with collision occurrence, but is an important factor in severity analysis); (ii) data that could be used for joint models are limited in nature because most of the data are collected after the collision has happened [12]; and, (iii) consequence outcomes and injury data are at the individual, vehicle, or accident level.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches can be used for collision severity analysis: (a) incorporating severity into the collision frequency models by modeling collisions classified by severity types [31][32][33][34]; and (b) modeling the conditional probability of each severity level for a given collision [14,15,17,35,36]. In this research, we adopted the second approach for three reasons: (i) different factors could have different effects on collision occurrence and severity (e.g., seat belt use has nothing to do with collision occurrence, but is an important factor in severity analysis); (ii) data that could be used for joint models are limited in nature because most of the data are collected after the collision has happened [12]; and, (iii) consequence outcomes and injury data are at the individual, vehicle, or accident level.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the need for such considerations, Ladron de Guevara and Washington (2004) investigated the simultaneity of fatality and injury crash outcomes. Bijleveld (2005) also examined the correlation structure between crash and injury counts. As expected, he found significant correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accident risk is considered based on three major dimensions such as the exposure, the accident and injury occurrence probabilities and the corresponding consequences. The most common approach applied in early works is to model the interaction between road geometry, traffic In such studies, univariate counting models for only one single model response variable are used, implying, for example that the number of accidents corresponding to different degrees of injury severity are modelled separately without taking into account the dependencies that exist between them [21,22]. Such dependencies are considered in more recent studies where the different response variables are modelled jointly using multivariate modelling techniques [23][24][25].…”
Section: Prediction Of Road Accidents Based On Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%