1976
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(76)90329-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The covalent structure of dog myoglobin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number is diminished by two residues in the case of dog myoglobin: His-113 and His-116 are missing (30). The (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This number is diminished by two residues in the case of dog myoglobin: His-113 and His-116 are missing (30). The (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of trout Mb, as shown here, S-nitrosation at a Cys residue appears to be responsible for the observed change in O 2 affinity. However, such a regulation mechanism cannot be of general significance, as most mammalian and avian Mbs lack Cys residues (7,39,8), in contrast to many fish and reptilian species that have Mbs containing several Cys (3). One could speculate that a high Cys content of the Mb and the ability to form S-nitrosated Mb may be beneficial in ectothermic animals like fish and reptiles, which are often subject to short-term fluctuations in tissue O 2 availability, regardless of the ability to adapt to long-term ambient hypoxia.…”
Section: Perspectives and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is perhaps useful to consider why the binding ability of the site is not necessarily completel3 Table 5. Antigenic sites ofsperm-whale Mb and substitutions within these regions in the other myoglobins The amino acid substitutions were based on the sequences given in the references cited: sperm-whale Mb (Edmundson, 1965; Romero-Herrera & Lehmann, 1974), finback-whale Mb (DiMarchi et al, 1978), killer-whale Mb (Castillo et al, 1977), chimpanzee Mb (Romero-Herrera & Lehmann, 1972), horse Mb (Dautrevaux et al, 1969;Romero-Herrera & Lehmann, 1974), sheep Mb (Han et al, 1972;V6tsch & Anderer, 1972), bovine Mb (Han et al, 1970), echidna Mb (Castillo et al, 1978), rabbit Mb (Romero-Herrera et al, 1976b), dog Mb (Dumur et al, 1976), cape-fox Mb (Jones et al, 1977) and chicken Mb (Deconinck et al, 1975). Residues in parentheses are part of the antigenic site only with some antisera.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Reaction Ofan Antigenic Sitementioning
confidence: 99%