1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002340050915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The course of the traumatising force in acceleration head injury: CT evidence

Abstract: Since brain damage in closed head injury of acceleration-deceleration type depends on the site of impact and on the course of the traumatising force, a reconstruction of these was attempted using CT. The study included 45 standard CT studies of adults with closed acceleration-deceleration head injuries. We selected 32 patients exclusively on the basis of CT findings of soft tissue contusion, skull fractures and cerebral contusions (coup and/or contrecoup, as well as other parenchymal lesions), while in the rem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the brain deformed in response, stretching in the sagittal plane along the anteriorposterior axis of the brain could produce a contusion in the fronto-parietal cortex. Angular and rotational acceleration are more apt to produce shear strain than linear acceleration given the shape of the brain in the rigid skull [8,[11][12][13]. These forces elicit the contusions in inferior frontal and anterior temporal cortex that are the classic locations of contusions following trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the brain deformed in response, stretching in the sagittal plane along the anteriorposterior axis of the brain could produce a contusion in the fronto-parietal cortex. Angular and rotational acceleration are more apt to produce shear strain than linear acceleration given the shape of the brain in the rigid skull [8,[11][12][13]. These forces elicit the contusions in inferior frontal and anterior temporal cortex that are the classic locations of contusions following trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[6][7][8] Contrecoup lesions have been described as lesions ranging from 90-270 0 , 151-210 0 , and 180 0 from the impact location. [8][9][10][11] While no exact definition has been established,it can be agreed that it is a lesion that is not directly beneath the site of impact and, in this study, contrecoup is defined as the lesion opposite of impact. Two main mechanisms are identified as the the reason behind contrecoup injury in this study, namely cavitation and inertial injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angular and rotational acceleration tend to generate more shear stress than linear acceleration. [35] Superior frontoparietal cortex contusions are rare and account for up to 4% of cortical contusions. [25]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%