Courage has been described as a human virtue by philosophers across time and cultures (e.g., Dahlsgaard, Peterson, & Seligman, 2005;Miller, 2002). It figures prominently in positive psychology's science of virtue (e.g., Peterson & Seligman, 2004), and interest in courage as a topic of psychological study has grown with the field of positive psychology. However, what psychologists mean by the term courage has varied, and this variation has important consequences for understanding the construct. We therefore asked ourselves the following questions: Do we see courage as rare, lofty, and worthy of societal acknowledgment, which we view as part of courage as an accolade, or do we see courage as something that occurs many times in the typical person's life, a process, perhaps the process, by which people overcome subjectively felt risks for compelling reasons? Though desirable, most of the acts that fall under this second type of courage, which we call courage as a process, may pass unnoticed by observers and are not typically deserving of societal recognition.Courage can be defined in many ways. Norton and Weiss (2009) described courage as "persistence or perseverance despite having fear" (p. 214, emphasis in the original). Pury and Woodard (2009) defined it as "the intentional pursuit of a worthy goal despite the perception of personal threat and uncertain outcome" (p. 247). Peterson and Seligman (2004) defined courage as "emotional strengths that involve the exercise of will to accomplish goals in the face of opposition, external or internal" (p. 29). Finally, in the most comprehensive study of the definition of courage, Rate, Clarke, Lindsay, and Sternberg (2007) used a multimethod approach to develop a definition of courage as "(a) a willful, intentional act, (b) executed after mindful deliberation, (c) involving objective substantial risk to the actor, (d) primarily motivated to bring about a noble good or worthy end, (e) despite, perhaps, the emotion of fear" (p. 95).The first two definitions focus on courage as a process. In Pury and Woodard's (2009) work the definition is general. Pury and Woodard highlighted the importance of the worth of the goal and two unknowns-risk to the actor and completion of the task-without any particular behavioral or emotional response described. Norton and Weiss's (2009) definition is directed at the specific case of predicting performance during an exposure-like exercise for phobias. 67