2014
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2014.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The costs of small drinking water systems removing arsenic from groundwater

Abstract: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted an Arsenic Demonstration Program whereby the Agency purchased, installed, and evaluated the performance and cost of 50 small water arsenic removal treatment systems in the USA. A major goal of the program was to collect highquality cost data (capital and operational and maintenance (O&M)) from the long-term operation(1-4 years) of these systems. The technologies consisted of adsorptive media (AM), iron removal (IR), coagulation/filtration (C/F), ion exchan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arsenic demonstration program ran from 2003 to 2011 and included 50 full‐scale pilot study projects for removing arsenic in 26 states (USEPA 2016b, Sorg et al 2015). The arsenic demonstration program provided full‐scale pilot study data, information on cost, labor requirements, contaminant removal performance, and waste stream data (USEPA 2016b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arsenic demonstration program ran from 2003 to 2011 and included 50 full‐scale pilot study projects for removing arsenic in 26 states (USEPA 2016b, Sorg et al 2015). The arsenic demonstration program provided full‐scale pilot study data, information on cost, labor requirements, contaminant removal performance, and waste stream data (USEPA 2016b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of media replacement can be substantial. The performance and cost data for the 28 AM systems evaluated by the ADP showed that media replacement averaged more than 80% of the total O&M cost and was as high as 95% of the total O&M cost at some sites (Sorg et al 2015, Wang & Chen 2011). The cost of new media on a dollar‐per‐cubic‐foot basis can range from around $100 to as high as $600.…”
Section: The Am Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assist water systems, particularly small systems, in selecting a cost‐effective arsenic removal technology, USEPA conducted the Arsenic Demonstration Program (ADP) from 2003 to 2011, which evaluated the performance of 50 full‐scale arsenic removal systems (Wang & Chen 2011). Of the 50 systems evaluated, 28 (56%) were AM technologies involving 10 different media products.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three overlapping phases (Rounds 1, 2, and 2a), the Arsenic Demo evaluated full‐scale arsenic removal technologies at 50 small water systems located in 26 states between 2001 and 2011 (Sorg, ). Key conclusions from the Arsenic Demo, including treatment technology effectiveness, and costs, are summarized elsewhere (e.g., Chen, Wang, Lytle, & Sorg, ; Lytle et al, ; Sorg, , ; Sorg & Chen, ; Sorg, Chen, Wang, & Kolisz, ; Sorg, Kolisz, Chen, & Wang, ; Sorg, Wang, & Chen, ; Wang & Chen, ). Final reports for each of the 50 systems were also made public through the Arsenic Demo website (USEPA, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%