2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The costs of industrial accidents for the organization: Developing methods and tools for evaluation and cost–benefit analysis of investment in safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seriousness of the injury is measured in different ways either through the type of injury, the sick leave or grade of incapacity. In the last 15 years research on the cost to the victim and to the enterprise has documented that occupational injuries are relatively rather expensive and it seems to be a win-win situation to raise the safety level for both the employees, the employers as well as society (Eurostat, 2004), (Rikhardsson & Impgaards, 2004), (Gavious, et al, 2009). …”
Section: The Consequences -The Victim and The Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seriousness of the injury is measured in different ways either through the type of injury, the sick leave or grade of incapacity. In the last 15 years research on the cost to the victim and to the enterprise has documented that occupational injuries are relatively rather expensive and it seems to be a win-win situation to raise the safety level for both the employees, the employers as well as society (Eurostat, 2004), (Rikhardsson & Impgaards, 2004), (Gavious, et al, 2009). …”
Section: The Consequences -The Victim and The Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the costs of injuries from occupational accidents for EU 15 is still estimated at 55 billion euros (Eurostat, 2004). Other cost calculations tell stories of great costs for both employers, employees and the broader society (Gavious, et al, 2009), (Rikhardsson & Impgaards, 2004), (Labour Organisation in Denmark, 2010), (Eurostat, 2004). If employees, employers, the regulatory authorities or politicians are asked, then all agree that nobody should be injured when they are at work and certainly not be made permanently disabled or get killed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some important reasons as to why prevention investment decision-makers really require more objective and more adequate aids and tools for deciding about major accident prevention. The first reason is optimization, as company management often has difficulties with this decision-making process: Paltrinieri et al [1] and Gavious et al [2] indicate that there is a general lack of knowledge concerning the full range of costs related to (major) accidents, as well as difficulties to determine these costs and benefits. Moreover, there is a widespread believe that major accident costs are often inevitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fall accidents are the highest cause of work-related injuries and fatalities in the U.S. (Gavious et al, 2009;Hu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Falls In the Us Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct cost effect of injuries and fatalities in the construction industry may be as much as billions of dollars annually (Hallowell, 2010), whereas the indirect cost impact is estimated to be six times the direct costs (Chen, Fisher, & Krishnamurthy, 1994;Gavious, Mizrahi, Shani, & Minchuk, 2009). Accident prevention and control in the construction industry is a matter of huge concern, as the business exhibits one of the worst safety records among various high-risk sectors including the chemical industry, mining, and transportation (Hallowell, 2010;Sa, Seo & Choi, 2009).…”
Section: Chapter 1: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%