2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2012.00589.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of treating substance use disorders: individual versus family therapy

Abstract: This study examined the cost of substance use disorders treatment in a large healthcare organization. A survival analysis demonstrated that family therapy utilised the least number of sessions (M = 2.41) when treating substance use disorders followed by individual therapy (M = 3.38) and mixed therapy (M = 6.40). Family therapy was the least costly of the three types, at $124.55 per episode of care for a client, with individual therapy costing $170.22 and mixed therapy $319.55. The ratio of family therapists ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study Six (Morgan et al 2012) This study looked at the cost of treating substance use disorders for more than 14,000 unique patients with individual and family therapy. Survival analysis revealed that family therapy on average used 2.41 sessions, individual therapy used 3.38 sessions, and mixed therapy used 6.40.…”
Section: Study One (Crane and Payne 2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study Six (Morgan et al 2012) This study looked at the cost of treating substance use disorders for more than 14,000 unique patients with individual and family therapy. Survival analysis revealed that family therapy on average used 2.41 sessions, individual therapy used 3.38 sessions, and mixed therapy used 6.40.…”
Section: Study One (Crane and Payne 2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promising RCT results may be ultimately lost when regulatory bodies, including insurance providers, reshape EBP delivery, such as altering treatment dosage by constricting the amount of time patients are allowed in treatment (Gotham, 2006). Finally, once an EBP is available, client preference (Rieckmann et al, 2007) or financial constraints, such as required co-payments (Morgan et al, 2013), may limit center utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the recovered addict, receiving help from supportive people has been identified as the most important factor to one’s personal recovery process [7]. Interventions that include family therapy have been found more effective than individual or mixed approaches [8], and for disenfranchised persons (e.g. those recovering from severe heroin addiction), recovery from the social disruptions caused by the abuse is a simultaneous process, only rivaled in importance by quitting the drug [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%