2008
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2008.921279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Superconducting Magnets as a Function of Stored Energy and Design Magnetic Induction Times the Field Volume

Abstract: Abstract-By various theorems one can relate the capital cost of superconducting magnets to the magnetic energy stored within that magnet. This is particularly true for magnet where the cost is dominated by the structure needed to carry the magnetic forces. One can also relate the cost o f the magnet to the product o f the magnetic induction and the field volume. The relationship used to estimate the cost the magnet is a function o f the type of magnet it is. This paper updates the cost functions given in two p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the loads exceed the limit of the wire/tape then extra reinforcement is needed, the magnet outer diameter starts to grow, demanding even more material and leading to a catastrophic increase in volume (and thus in cost) despite the modest increase in magnetic field (see figure 27). The relationship between magnet costs, field and volume is discussed in [187] for several type of large magnets.…”
Section: High Field Solenoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the loads exceed the limit of the wire/tape then extra reinforcement is needed, the magnet outer diameter starts to grow, demanding even more material and leading to a catastrophic increase in volume (and thus in cost) despite the modest increase in magnetic field (see figure 27). The relationship between magnet costs, field and volume is discussed in [187] for several type of large magnets.…”
Section: High Field Solenoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the fusion power generated under ignition or the maximum possible plasma density, equal to the Sudo density limit [22], could have been minimized. Instead, we decided to minimize the magnetic field since it clearly correlates with the cost of the coils and their support structures [23]. Only an initial estimate of possible operating points is sought here.…”
Section: Assumptions and Governing Equations: Ignition Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of the conductor for the LTS magnet is ∼110 k$ including 10 percent overage. In a typical Nb-Ti magnet, the conductor is 10 to 20 percent of the magnet cost [11] (not including the iron or cooling). Magnet vendors often say that cost of coil winding and potting of a Nb-Ti simple solenoid is about the same as the conductor in the coil.…”
Section: Magnet Capital Cost and Operating Costmentioning
confidence: 99%