The Cost of Saving Electricity: A Multi-Program Cost Curve for Programs Funded by U.S. Utility Customers

Abstract

This study analyzed the cost performance of electricity efficiency programs implemented by 116 investor-owned utilities between 2009 and 2015 in 41 states, representing about three-quarters of the total spending on U.S. efficiency programs. We applied our typology to characterize efficiency programs along several dimensions (market sector, technology, delivery approach, and intervention strategy) and report the costs incurred by utilities and other program administrators to achieve electricity savings as a result of the programs. Such cost performance data can be used to compare relative costs of different types of efficiency programs, evaluate efficiency options alongside other electricity resources, benchmark local efficiency programs against regional and national cost estimates, and assess the costs of meeting state efficiency policies. The savings-weighted average cost of saved electricity for the period was $0.025/kilowatt-hour (kWh). The cost of saved electricity for programs that targeted residential customers was $0.021/kWh, compared to $0.025/kWh for programs for commercial and industrial customers. Ultimately, we developed an aggregate program savings “cost curve” for the actual electricity efficiency resource during the period that provides insights into the relative costs of various types of efficiency programs and the savings contribution of each program type to the efficiency resource at a national level.

An approach to targeting cryptocurrency mining loads for energy efficiency enhancement

“…Marginal abatement cost of carbon ($/ton CO 2 ) 56. 45 can be concluded that increasing the contract lifecycle increases miners' profitability, and the miners tend to enter into the longterm contracts. Therefore, the government/PSR should adjust the contract lifecycle in such a way that the profitability of the miners corresponds to a reasonable range, so that the proposed energy efficiency programs are implemented at the lowest cost.…”

BTO Market Success Report 2015–2020

“…Energy efficiency-the use of less energy to perform the same function-keeps the growth of energy consumption from spiraling upwards. Energy is often cheaper to save than it is to produce, making energy efficiency one of the most cost-effective means to meet society's growing energy needs (Goldman, et al 2020).…”

The Cost of Decarbonization and Energy Upgrade Retrofits for US Homes

“…The levelized cost of saved energy (LCOE) is a type of analysis commonly used to assess the financial performance of demand-side efficiency programs, including whole house retrofits, as they compare to other supply-side energy sources (Billingsley et al, 2014;Goldman et al, 2020).…”

“…For a given cost and savings, the LCOE are reduced when using longer measure life and lower discount rate values. A 6% discount rate is commonly used as a proxy for the cost of capital for typical investor-owned utilities (Goldman et al, 2020). But others have justified lower discount rates of 1-3% for use in environmental assessments of carbon emissions .…”

“…If we assumed a 6% discount rate, the LCOE median would have been $0.134 per kWh. For comparison, (Goldman et al, 2020) analyzed a variety of energy retrofit program types, and they reported typical LCOE for whole house retrofit programs of $0.069 per kWh, assuming a 6% discount rate. Whole home programs had the second highest LCOE in Goldman's analysis, while lighting and other single-measure programs had lower LCOE.…”