Measuring Wellbeing 2017
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199944590.003.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…whose integrals are 1/N . In this work we shall take σ(z) = 0.05 (1 + z), coherently with Euclid expectations (Amendola et al (2013), see also Casarini et al (2011)); the distributions D r , when normalized to unity, are then dubbed δ r . They are used to define the window functions…”
Section: Tomographic Windowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…whose integrals are 1/N . In this work we shall take σ(z) = 0.05 (1 + z), coherently with Euclid expectations (Amendola et al (2013), see also Casarini et al (2011)); the distributions D r , when normalized to unity, are then dubbed δ r . They are used to define the window functions…”
Section: Tomographic Windowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore hardly surprising that a number of experiments have been planned -4as, e.g., BOSS 1 , PanStarrs 2 , HETDEX 3 , DES 4 , LSST 5 , KIDS 6 WFIRST 7 , and Euclid 8 (Amendola et al 2013), aiming to scan a large area of the sky, seeking fresh information on weak lensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At cosmological level, they can produce an EOS for the dark energy (in the form of a scalar-field) which can vary in cosmic time, unlike the cosmological constant Λ. This variation will be tested in the forthcoming years by numerous projects [17][18][19][20] which will help to validate or rule out a simple ΛCDM model. Since STT are a generalization of the famous Brans-Dicke theory, these theories predict small variations of the effective gravitational coupling G eff , which can be further tested observationally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%