2021
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of cure: Examining objective and subjective financial toxicity in head and neck cancer survivors

Abstract: Background Little is documented regarding objective financial metrics and their impact on subjective financial toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. Methods In a cross‐sectional analysis, 71 survivors with available claims data for HNC‐specific out‐of‐pocket expenses (OOPE) completed a survey including patient‐reported, subjective financial toxicity outcome tools: the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and the Financial Distress Questionnaire (FDQ). Results Worse COST scores were sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other work demonstrating that HNC-specific out-of-pocket expenses alone are not a predictive metric of psychologic financial hardship supports this assertion. 17 Although there is a foundational body of work examining claims data, treatment costs, and medical expenditures in patients with HNC, 9,10,12-14 the subjective implications of these financial consequences in the psychologic response domain are understudied and hence necessitate future research. Prior studies in survivors of other cancers have demonstrated that subjective indicators of financial burden such as perceived financial difficulty have a stronger impact on quality of life than direct health care costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work demonstrating that HNC-specific out-of-pocket expenses alone are not a predictive metric of psychologic financial hardship supports this assertion. 17 Although there is a foundational body of work examining claims data, treatment costs, and medical expenditures in patients with HNC, 9,10,12-14 the subjective implications of these financial consequences in the psychologic response domain are understudied and hence necessitate future research. Prior studies in survivors of other cancers have demonstrated that subjective indicators of financial burden such as perceived financial difficulty have a stronger impact on quality of life than direct health care costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 A recent study showed an exponential association between objective and subjective financial toxicity. 12 Unlike the objective form, which can be measured with economic metrics (eg, the ratio of out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures to income), subjective financial toxicity is more challenging to assess because it involves quantifying perceptions using patient-reported outcome measures. There are generic instruments, that is, nonexclusive for cancer, that can be used to measure subjective financial toxicity in any health condition, such as the InCharge Personal Financial Well-being Scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median annual out‐of‐pocket medical expenses for HNC patients is $8101 compared with $5930 for patients with other cancer types 27 . Expenses may continue well after HNC treatment has ended 28 . The financial toxicity may also affect patients' family caregivers 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%