2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1710.07527
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost number and the determining number of a graph

Saeid Alikhani,
Samaneh Soltani

Abstract: The distinguishing number D(G) of a graph G is the least integer d such that G has an vertex labeling with d labels that is preserved only by a trivial automorphism. The minimum size of a label class in such a labeling of G with D(G) = d is called the cost of d-distinguishing G and is denoted by ρ d (G). A set of vertices S ⊆ V (G) is a determining set for G if every automorphism of G is uniquely determined by its action on S. The determining number of G, Det(G), is the minimum cardinality of determining sets … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can ask how close G is to being (d−1)distinguishable (which is the size of a smallest color class) or we can ask how many vertices we need to (re)color to achieve a d-distinguishing coloring (which is the size of the smallest complement of a color class). In [4], Alikhani and Soltani take the first approach by defining the cost number, denoted ρ d (G), to be the size of a smallest color class over all d-distinguishing colorings of G. In this paper we take the second approach by defining the paint cost of d-distinguishing G, or equivalently the d-paint cost, denoted ρ d (G), to be the minimum size of the complement of a color class over all d-distinguishing colorings. As one expects from generalizations, if…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can ask how close G is to being (d−1)distinguishable (which is the size of a smallest color class) or we can ask how many vertices we need to (re)color to achieve a d-distinguishing coloring (which is the size of the smallest complement of a color class). In [4], Alikhani and Soltani take the first approach by defining the cost number, denoted ρ d (G), to be the size of a smallest color class over all d-distinguishing colorings of G. In this paper we take the second approach by defining the paint cost of d-distinguishing G, or equivalently the d-paint cost, denoted ρ d (G), to be the minimum size of the complement of a color class over all d-distinguishing colorings. As one expects from generalizations, if…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%