2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost-Effectiveness of Using Platelet-Rich Plasma During Rotator Cuff Repair: A Markov Model Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Insurance companies still do not recognize PRP as standard of care, and thus PRP must be paid by patients out of pocket. It has been estimated recently that the cost of PRP is $500 to $1,500 per application 18 . It is important to have an open discussion regarding the cost of PRP injections, given that it may be prohibitively expensive for some patients.…”
Section: Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insurance companies still do not recognize PRP as standard of care, and thus PRP must be paid by patients out of pocket. It has been estimated recently that the cost of PRP is $500 to $1,500 per application 18 . It is important to have an open discussion regarding the cost of PRP injections, given that it may be prohibitively expensive for some patients.…”
Section: Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of PRP in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is the subject of the article by Samuelson et al, 7 but in the context of cost-effectiveness using a Markov model of analysis. When compared with conventional models, Markov models have more complex assumptions that forecast clinical problems by predicting decisions that involve continuous risk over time where the timing of events and potential repetition of events are important.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 1237mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From analysis of current literature, this requires an additional absolute risk reduction in re-tear rates of 9.1%. 46 Overall, additional research is still needed to determine the utility of PRP as a biologic augment for RCR, particularly with respect to clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and preparation type.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although initial pioneering investigations with both animal and human models have demonstrated that the potential for tendon regeneration, improved tendon integrity, and increased healing after BMAC augmentation may exist, the technology is still considered to be highly experimental and should not be included as part of any standard of care for rotator cuff repair based on available evidence. 1,2,8,9,13,46,45 At this time, additional clinical trials utilizing BMAC augmentation in rotator cuff repair are recommended in order to establish a possible role in future patient treatment.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%