2012
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost-Effectiveness of Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in the United States in Men Who Have Sex With Men

Abstract: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to implement PrEP for persons who might benefit one must delve into substantial detail about how to ensure coverage by public sector programs, as well as how to involve the private sector in reducing the drug price and encouraging insurance companies to guarantee coverage. Further, estimates of the cost-effectiveness of this investment would be useful as the published literature on the cost-effectiveness of PrEP varies from study to study largely depending on how PrEP is targeted in its implementation (and cost-effectiveness is key for achieving the maximum public health benefit for a given level of resource) [14][15][16]. Therefore, PrEP is a critical new tool in HIV prevention, but identifying payment strategies and ways to best target PrEP services are key to its most impactful implementation and should be included in the federal action plan to the updated NHAS.…”
Section: Weaknesses (Internal To the Updated Nhas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to implement PrEP for persons who might benefit one must delve into substantial detail about how to ensure coverage by public sector programs, as well as how to involve the private sector in reducing the drug price and encouraging insurance companies to guarantee coverage. Further, estimates of the cost-effectiveness of this investment would be useful as the published literature on the cost-effectiveness of PrEP varies from study to study largely depending on how PrEP is targeted in its implementation (and cost-effectiveness is key for achieving the maximum public health benefit for a given level of resource) [14][15][16]. Therefore, PrEP is a critical new tool in HIV prevention, but identifying payment strategies and ways to best target PrEP services are key to its most impactful implementation and should be included in the federal action plan to the updated NHAS.…”
Section: Weaknesses (Internal To the Updated Nhas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this is the variation in the cost of drugs in various countries. For example, Walensky and colleagues [49] estimated the cost of drugs for a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based vaginal microbicide was $55 a year per person in South Africa (2010 US$), and Juusola and colleagues [53] estimated the cost of drugs for an oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based pre-exposure prophylaxis program was $15,589 a year per person in the US (2010 US$).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Desai and colleagues [50] estimated that the cost per QALY saved for a preexposure prophylaxis program for MSM in the US was $31,970 (2007 US$), and Paltiel and colleagues [48] estimated the cost per QALY saved for a pre-exposure prophylaxis program for MSM in the US was $298,000 (2006 US$). Subsequently, Juusola and colleagues [53] estimated the cost per QALY saved for a pre-exposure prophylaxis program for MSM in the US to be $172,000 (2010 US$).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations